Search for: "United States of America v. Kelly" Results 61 - 80 of 167
Sorted by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
18 Oct 2018, 6:50 am by Shana Tabak
Lee, General Counsel, Export-Import Bank of the United States Elizabeth R. [read post]
14 Feb 2017, 10:23 am by Jordan Brunner
Reuters reports that the United States strongly believes that the killing was ordered by Kim Jong Un. [read post]
16 Aug 2017, 9:01 pm by Marci A. Hamilton
Can you do what the Framers imagined and hoped (against hope) United States’ leaders would do: serve the people and the higher good? [read post]
9 Feb 2014, 2:27 pm
  Perry v Truefitt, 49 ER 749 stated that ‘A man is not to sell his own goods under pretence that they are the goods of another man. [read post]
30 Oct 2012, 4:00 am by Terry Hart
, says: In the same way that Congress did not intend to cabin section 602’s application to copies from countries with a shorter term or compulsory licenses, the legislative record provides no evidence that it intended its application to situations where a trademark owner adds a copyrightable insignia or label on goods to protect against their parallel importation into the United States. [read post]
30 Oct 2012, 4:00 am by Terry Hart
The Software and Information Industry Association, arguing that “the Copyright Act contains the flexibility to deal with unforeseen applications of section 602″, says: In the same way that Congress did not intend to cabin section 602’s application to copies from countries with a shorter term or compulsory licenses, the legislative record provides no evidence that it intended its application to situations where a trademark owner adds a copyrightable insignia or label on goods… [read post]
6 Apr 2023, 10:51 am by bndmorris
SUPREME COURT OF THE UNITED STATES 59. [read post]
29 May 2010, 6:33 am by thejaghunter
Lockett, Bessemer, AL ET3 Kelly R. [read post]
22 Jul 2021, 9:08 pm by Omar Khodor
Patent and Trademark Office updated its guidance related to the recent United States v. [read post]
16 Nov 2009, 4:51 am
(IPEG) United Kingdom EWHC: Registry decision leads to High Court estoppels: William Evans and Susan Mary Evans (trading as Firecraft) v Focal Point Fires plc (Marques) Lord Hoffmann on patentability of software and business methods (IPKat) Making life more comfy for designers? [read post]
16 Nov 2009, 4:51 am
(IPEG) United Kingdom EWHC: Registry decision leads to High Court estoppels: William Evans and Susan Mary Evans (trading as Firecraft) v Focal Point Fires plc (Marques) Lord Hoffmann on patentability of software and business methods (IPKat) Making life more comfy for designers? [read post]
16 Nov 2009, 4:51 am
(IPEG)   United Kingdom EWHC: Registry decision leads to High Court estoppels: William Evans and Susan Mary Evans (trading as Firecraft) v Focal Point Fires plc (Marques) Lord Hoffmann on patentability of software and business methods (IPKat) Making life more comfy for designers? [read post]