Search for: "United States of America v. Lai"
Results 161 - 180
of 442
Sort by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
23 Feb 2018, 10:00 am
” Maggs also casts doubt on Kaspersky’s claim that it is not an FSB unit, as indicated by public filings. [read post]
22 Feb 2018, 6:00 am
United States v. [read post]
10 Feb 2018, 2:24 pm
” McCreary Cty. v. [read post]
7 Feb 2018, 4:20 am
United States, an infamously murky 2006 decision on Clean Water Act jurisdiction. [read post]
21 Jan 2018, 12:01 am
Civil Liberties website: Writing in McCreary County, Kentucky v. [read post]
20 Jan 2018, 4:53 am
Her customers are mostly in the United States and Canada. [read post]
18 Jan 2018, 8:47 am
Data-Driven Regulatory Governance and Its Distorting Effects V. [read post]
18 Jan 2018, 4:53 am
Her customers are mostly in the United States and Canada. [read post]
17 Jan 2018, 8:00 am
I said their commercials usually misrepresent the present state of tax collection, with remarks like “The IRS is coming down harder than before. [read post]
5 Jan 2018, 5:59 am
The Board, however, saw a hole in the survey, namely that the wording of the survey questions suggested that the respondents could name only one brand.Frito-Lay North America, Inc. v. [read post]
31 Dec 2017, 11:24 am
Both decisions are in the case United States v. [read post]
22 Nov 2017, 2:00 pm
To start at the beginning, the United States is based on a basic proposition: assume everyone who has power is likely to abuse it. [read post]
12 Oct 2017, 4:22 pm
A person signing a DMCA notice must state a good faith belief that the use is not authorized, declare her authority to act under penalty of perjury, and risk damages for misrepresentation under section 512(f).[3] That source of protection has not technically disappeared, but its value is largely lost when notices are generated not by a person, but by a machine. [read post]
5 Oct 2017, 3:33 pm
A person signing a DMCA notice must state a good faith belief that the use is not authorized, declare her authority to act under penalty of perjury, and risk damages for misrepresentation under section 512(f).[3] That source of protection has not technically disappeared, but its value is largely lost when notices are generated not by a person, but by a machine. [read post]
27 Sep 2017, 5:20 am
That California judge, featured in Time Magazine,[v] is William W. [read post]
26 Jul 2017, 7:48 am
He filed an amicus brief for the Chamber of Commerce of the United States of America and other organizations in support of neither party in Jesner v. [read post]
25 Jul 2017, 9:25 pm
Maryland, 373 U.S. 83 (1963), or Giglio v. [read post]
20 Jul 2017, 11:00 am
” The Constitution provides that the president, like the vice president and all civil officers of the United States, “shall be removed from Office on Impeachment for and Conviction of, Treason, Bribery, or other high Crimes and Misdemeanors. [read post]
27 Jun 2017, 12:31 pm
Perhaps as a result, (4) most places within the United States have abandoned its use. [read post]
22 Jun 2017, 8:54 am
Steve Vladeck outlined his critiques of Justice Kennedy’s analysis of Bivens damages, as set forth in the majority opinion in Ziglar v. [read post]
