Search for: "United States of America v. Michel et al"
Results 1 - 20
of 36
Sort by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
22 Apr 2024, 5:00 am
Inst. v. [read post]
29 Feb 2024, 7:15 pm
Silja Voeneky, et. al., eds., The Cambridge Handbook of Responsible Artificial Intelligence: Interdisciplinary Perspectives (2022). 82. [read post]
16 Oct 2022, 4:10 pm
Secretary of state for Digital, Culture, Media and Sport Michelle Donelan welcomed President Biden’s executive order implementing the EU-US Data Privacy Framework. [read post]
2 Aug 2022, 6:30 am
Consider the now infamous case, United States v. [read post]
5 Oct 2021, 8:21 am
(HERE).The Conference brought together some of the most important and influential thinkers about the fundamentals of law in general, and that of the United States in particular. [read post]
13 Jul 2021, 10:58 am
In the United States (US), as for most developed countries,[6] trade policy and IP standards have consistently been linked, a pattern which can (at least partially) be traced back to extensive lobbying by senior management at US-based technology and pharmaceutical firms.[7] For example, since at least the 1980s, Pfizer Inc. has been involved in mobilizing other US firms and stakeholders to lobby US policymakers on the issue of international IP protection. [read post]
10 May 2021, 3:06 pm
MISHPAJA SHAJINE, INC., et al., Appellants, v. [read post]
30 Apr 2020, 1:53 pm
Finer et al., Reasons U.S. [read post]
2 Apr 2020, 7:58 am
Bell, et. al., Environmental Law Handbook (2019). [read post]
12 Oct 2017, 4:22 pm
A person signing a DMCA notice must state a good faith belief that the use is not authorized, declare her authority to act under penalty of perjury, and risk damages for misrepresentation under section 512(f).[3] That source of protection has not technically disappeared, but its value is largely lost when notices are generated not by a person, but by a machine. [read post]
5 Oct 2017, 3:33 pm
A person signing a DMCA notice must state a good faith belief that the use is not authorized, declare her authority to act under penalty of perjury, and risk damages for misrepresentation under section 512(f).[3] That source of protection has not technically disappeared, but its value is largely lost when notices are generated not by a person, but by a machine. [read post]
17 Mar 2016, 2:45 am
Cordis Corporation, et al., No. 15-998 Laches: SCA Hygiene Products Aktiebolag, et al. v. [read post]
27 Apr 2015, 4:59 am
Escape Media Group Inc et al).In Russia, owners of 'pirate' sites have been given a final warning by the government. [read post]
9 Apr 2014, 7:37 pm
Nash & Cynthia Robbins JJDPA (box accompanying Cahn et al.) [read post]
14 Oct 2013, 3:35 pm
., Appellant, v. [read post]
15 Aug 2013, 8:10 am
Penn State Law, Course Descriptions. [read post]
2 Jan 2013, 3:17 pm
United States of America v. [read post]
30 Apr 2012, 6:15 am
That this is the case, should not be hard to accept… in 2012, the road to the White House runs directly through the states hardest hit by the foreclosure crisis, most notably Ohio and Florida, but also Michigan, Nevada, and North Carolina, et al. [read post]
20 Dec 2011, 2:13 pm
(United States v. [read post]
21 Nov 2011, 2:07 pm
The case is Michelle Evette McCall et al v. [read post]
