Search for: "United States of America v. Rhodes" Results 41 - 60 of 135
Sorted by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
29 Oct 2008, 6:19 pm
  "Democracy was an adequate enough framework to form the United States of America," said Healey, although you could argue it also took a couple of wars to do that, "[and] it should be an adequate enough framework to decide" this dispute. [read post]
19 Jun 2011, 1:08 am by Máiréad Enright
 On June 19, 1995 the United States Supreme Court handed down judgment in Hurley v. [read post]
20 Mar 2007, 12:48 pm
United States, 199 F.3d 37, 45 (1st Cir. 1999), once subject matter jurisdiction attaches, "courts may exceed their authority or otherwise err without loss of jurisdiction. [read post]
27 Dec 2017, 11:19 am by Wolfgang Demino
Keller on behalf of STATE OF TEXAS (Keller, Scott) (Entered: 11/28/2017)11/28/201711 MOTION for Leave to File Brief of Amici Curiae by STATE OF TEXAS, STATE OF WEST VIRGINIA, STATE OF ALABAMA, STATE OF ARKANSAS, STATE OF GEORGIA, STATE OF LOUISIANA, STATE OF OKLAHOMA, STATE OF SOUTH CAROLINA (Attachments: # 1 Exhibit Proposed Brief of Texas et al., # 2 Text of Proposed Order)(Keller,… [read post]
27 Dec 2017, 11:19 am by Wolfgang Demino
Keller on behalf of STATE OF TEXAS (Keller, Scott) (Entered: 11/28/2017)11/28/201711 MOTION for Leave to File Brief of Amici Curiae by STATE OF TEXAS, STATE OF WEST VIRGINIA, STATE OF ALABAMA, STATE OF ARKANSAS, STATE OF GEORGIA, STATE OF LOUISIANA, STATE OF OKLAHOMA, STATE OF SOUTH CAROLINA (Attachments: # 1 Exhibit Proposed Brief of Texas et al., # 2 Text of Proposed Order)(Keller,… [read post]
2 Apr 2015, 1:13 pm by Margaret Wood
Question No. 5 Real Case: YES Citation: United States of America, Plaintiff-Appellee, v . [read post]
12 Feb 2016, 8:02 am by Lawfare Staff
Deputy National Security Adviser Ben Rhodes suggested that Mr. [read post]
6 Mar 2014, 12:41 pm
[a] regulatory body ... of ... the United States"—in this case, the FDA. [read post]
25 Apr 2016, 5:53 am by SHG
United States, the law at stake was the Armed Career Criminal Act, and let’s face it, who loves armed career criminals? [read post]
6 Jan 2023, 5:53 am by Mary B. McCord
Oath Keepers lawyer Kellye SoRelle called Stone a “go-between” for paramilitary groups and Trump-affiliated activists, including Nick Fuentes, the avowed anti-Semitic racist who founded the America First Political Action Conference in 2020. [read post]
13 Sep 2022, 6:30 am by Guest Blogger
”  She bases her skepticism in part on her justifiably prize-winning work on the history of racial relations in America. [read post]
6 Sep 2021, 12:13 am by Chukwuma Okoli
In the instant case, the Court of Appeal held that there was no material evidence placed before the court to establish the change of name of the plaintiff-appellant company, and the resolution for change of name in Brazil that was provided before the court was deemed insufficient.[3] In Edicomsa International Inc and Associates v CITEC International Estates Ltd,[4] the plaintiff-appellant was a foreign company incorporated in the United States of America. [read post]
26 Jun 2019, 9:01 pm by Vikram David Amar
Section One straightforwardly provides: The right of citizens of the United States to vote shall not be denied or abridged by the United States or by any State on account of sex.Moving beyond the bare text, it is important, even (maybe especially) a hundred years later, to think more about what the Amendment really sought to constitutionally accomplish, and how its full import has not been deeply understood. [read post]
26 Jun 2018, 3:32 pm by Peter Margulies
But here he diverged from that path in citing one of the most celebrated examples of presidential speech: President George Washington’s reassurance to the Hebrew Congregation of Newport, Rhode Island, that the government of the United States lends “bigotry no sanction” and “persecution no assistance. [read post]
13 Oct 2021, 1:07 pm by David Kopel
Citing the historic sea laws of Rhodes, Germany, the United Kingdom, and other nations, the Court observed that the laws forbade sailors to desert while in port. [read post]