Search for: "United States of America v. Test" Results 1 - 20 of 1,730
Sort by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
3 May 2024, 8:38 am by Eric Goldman
April 22, 2024) The parties both sell tests for determining when a woman is ovulating. [read post]
1 May 2024, 6:30 am by Guest Blogger
In the United States, however, the Alaska high court decision became an anomaly, not a trendsetter. [read post]
30 Apr 2024, 3:12 pm by Bill Marler
 E. coli O157:H7 is one of thousands of serotypes Escherichia coli.[1] The combination of letters and numbers in the name of the E. coli O157:H7 refers to the specific antigens (proteins which provoke an antibody response) found on the body and tail or flagellum[2] respectively and distinguish it from other types of E. coli.[3] Most serotypes of E. coli are harmless and live as normal flora in the intestines of healthy humans and… [read post]
25 Apr 2024, 9:30 pm by The Regulatory Review
Supreme Court recognized the Boy Scouts of America’s First Amendment right to exclude gay men from membership—defining it as the right of “expressive association”—in the case Boy Scouts of America v. [read post]
24 Apr 2024, 5:57 am by Norman L. Eisen
The United States, like many other functioning democracies, is hardly immune from backsliding and lurching toward autocracy. [read post]
23 Apr 2024, 11:53 am by Steven Calabresi
United States on jurisdictional grounds is a far better way of deciding Trump v. [read post]
22 Apr 2024, 5:00 am by Bernard Bell
  The second was the Ninth Circuit’s less demanding “appearance and function” test, Garnier v. [read post]
15 Apr 2024, 2:31 am by INFORRM
United States On 11 April 2024, the Colorado Court of Appeals found that Section 230 immunity applied to two retweets from Donald Trump and his son about a Dominion Voting employee that said he was going to make sure Trump would not win the 2020 election, Coomer v Donald J. [read post]
7 Apr 2024, 3:04 am by Russell Knight
Social Media Posting And Free Speech In An Illinois Divorce Both the United States and the Illinois constitutions have enshrined free speech as a right. [read post]
5 Apr 2024, 1:00 am by INFORRM
The first panel, “Breakthrough Verdicts: Legal Decisions Shaping the UN’s Sustainable Development Goals,” will discuss landmark rulings and regional perspectives from Latin America and the Caribbean, Asia, Africa, Europe, and the United States. [read post]
2 Apr 2024, 9:05 pm by renholding
” ENDNOTE [1] See Order, Lujan Claimants v. [read post]
25 Mar 2024, 10:47 am by Jim Lindgren
Railroad Commission—another unconstitutional conditions case—the Court declared: "It is inconceivable that guaranties embedded in the Constitution of the United States may thus be manipulated out of existence. [read post]
23 Mar 2024, 11:29 am
• ParticipantsThe following may send representatives, without the right to vote and at the charge of their corresponding administrative budgets:- Parliamentary Assembly of the Council of Europe;- Congress of Local and Regional Authorities of the Council of Europe;- European Court of Human Rights;- Commissioner for Human Rights of the Council of Europe;- Conference of INGOs of the Council of Europe;- Eurimages;- European Audiovisual Observatory;- Committees or other bodies of the Council of… [read post]
20 Mar 2024, 8:24 pm by Chuck Cosson
  As CISA Director Jen Easterly noted to the New York Times,[15] the most “critical infrastructure” of the United States is our cognitive infrastructure – the framework and tools by which citizens examine and analyze reality. [read post]
19 Mar 2024, 2:10 pm by Josh Blackman
Today, the Supreme Court issued an order on the emergency docket in United States v. [read post]
23 Feb 2024, 8:00 am by Sasha Volokh
You think back to an older case: Boy Scouts of America v. [read post]
22 Feb 2024, 2:04 pm by Josh Blackman
& Pol'y Rev. 53, 66 & n.49, 98 & n.207 (1999); see also Timothy Farrar, Manual of the Constitution of the United States of America 436 (Boston, Little, Brown, & Co. 3d ed. rev. 1872) ("The general power of impeachment and trial may extend to others besides civil officers, as military or naval officers, or even persons not in office, and to other offences than those expressly requiring a judgment of removal from office . . . . [read post]