Search for: "United States of America v. Test" Results 41 - 60 of 1,730
Sorted by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
6 Feb 2022, 10:00 pm
When the United States Supreme Court spoke to patent subject matter eligibility under Section 101 of the America Invents Act, the speed of U.S. patent prosecution took a decided downturn. [read post]
15 Oct 2010, 8:00 am by Courtney Minick
United States of America et al., a case heard in the United States District Court Central District of California by Judge Virginia A. [read post]
23 Jul 2006, 7:56 pm by The Owens Law Firm, P.L.L.C.
Extrinsic evidence of sexual assaults to show propensity is allowed, even those assaults for which the defendant has not been charged.UNITED STATES OF AMERICA, Plaintiff - Appellee, v. [read post]
27 May 2019, 10:26 am by Steven Cohen
United States of AmericaUnited States District Court – Western District of Texas – May 10th, 2019) involves a motor-vehicle collision between the plaintiff and defendant, a United States Marine, who plaintiff alleges was acting in the course and scope of his employment with the United States Navy at the time of the accident. [read post]
16 Apr 2012, 4:49 pm by Utah Criminal Defense Blog
State of Utah v Gomez concerns a search and seizure case where the defendant was found guilty of possessing a variety of illegal drugs. [read post]
14 Jul 2020, 4:14 am
" As to meaning, applicant's mark "suggests a subset of Opposer's TEQUILA emanating from or associated with the United States of America. [read post]
13 Aug 2014, 12:14 pm
Practice Tip: The United States Supreme Court addressed the elements required for trade dress to be protected in Two Pesos, Inc. v. [read post]
24 May 2010, 3:08 pm
Concepcion, which will test whether the Federal Arbitration Act preempts state unconscionability law. [read post]
29 Jun 2022, 5:57 am by Steven Cohen
BMW of North America, LLC et al – United States District Court – Eastern District of Missouri – June 29th, 2022) involves a claim that BMW did not disclose that the plaintiff’s engine was defective and which caused it to burn an excessive amount of oil. [read post]
31 May 2021, 7:51 pm by Peter Mahler
The New York Court of Appeals’ 2012 opinion in Pappas v Tzolis, decided in the wake and spirit of that court’s rulings the year before in the Centro Empresarial v America Movil and Arfa v Zamir cases, raised the bar for claims of fraud and breach of fiduciary duty brought by non-controlling shareholders and LLC members in connection with buyout transactions. [read post]