Search for: "United States v. Booker"
Results 61 - 80
of 846
Sort by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
19 Jun 2018, 6:26 am
Under United States v. [read post]
18 May 2018, 2:38 pm
Booker, Johnson v. [read post]
18 May 2018, 8:02 am
United States, 17-1059, which presents what may be the most specific criminal-law question in the history of the world. [read post]
9 May 2018, 4:35 pm
Booker, Johnson v. [read post]
9 May 2018, 9:40 am
Booker when the Sentencing Guidelines were still mandatory. [read post]
28 Apr 2018, 12:23 pm
Cory Booker) and the “Special Counsel Integrity Act” (sponsored by Thom Tillis and Democratic Sen. [read post]
27 Apr 2018, 6:47 am
United States, 16-8997, United States v. [read post]
27 Apr 2018, 3:23 am
Booker. [read post]
26 Apr 2018, 6:07 pm
Booker, Johnson v. [read post]
24 Apr 2018, 10:41 am
Responding to the government’s argument that the Supreme Court has on previous occasions recognized that a sentencing reduction based upon Section 3582(c)(2) is not governed by the constitutional or remedial holding of United States v. [read post]
19 Apr 2018, 4:43 pm
Booker, Johnson v. [read post]
19 Apr 2018, 12:38 pm
United States, 17-646, Tyler v. [read post]
16 Apr 2018, 12:28 pm
That system lasted until 2005, when the Supreme Court in United States v. [read post]
13 Apr 2018, 10:04 am
” In that correspondence, Senators Warren and Booker cited to a study by Princeton economists that found that “fully 58% of the 156 largest franchisors operating around 340,000 franchise units used some form of anti-competitive ‘no-poach’ agreements. [read post]
13 Apr 2018, 3:09 am
See, United States v. [read post]
12 Apr 2018, 12:37 pm
” In that correspondence, Senators Warren and Booker cited to a study by Princeton economists that found that “fully 58% of the 156 largest franchisors operating around 340,000 franchise units used some form of anti-competitive ‘no-poach’ agreements. [read post]
11 Apr 2018, 2:11 pm
Booker, Johnson v. [read post]
6 Apr 2018, 1:21 pm
Booker, Johnson v. [read post]
30 Mar 2018, 2:24 am
§ 2260- Production of sexually explicit depictions of a minor for importation into the United States. [read post]
29 Mar 2018, 7:01 am
Booker, Johnson v. [read post]
