Search for: "United States v. Booker"
Results 81 - 100
of 846
Sort by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
28 Mar 2018, 1:22 pm
Booker, Johnson v. [read post]
28 Mar 2018, 4:00 am
For example, the Tillis-Coons bill (the “Special Counsel Integrity Act”) already provides that “An action filed under this subsection shall be heard and determined by a court of 3 judges not later than 14 days after the date on which the action is filed in accordance with the provisions of section 2284 of title 28, United States Code, and any appeal shall lie to the Supreme Court. [read post]
26 Mar 2018, 11:07 am
& Annuity v. [read post]
22 Mar 2018, 2:09 pm
Booker, Johnson v. [read post]
22 Mar 2018, 8:11 am
United States, 17-6540, Orr v. [read post]
12 Mar 2018, 12:51 pm
Booker, Johnson v. [read post]
8 Mar 2018, 7:57 am
Booker, Johnson v. [read post]
4 Mar 2018, 9:23 am
Probation’s “guilt by association” a Ninth no-go.United States v. [read post]
1 Mar 2018, 11:43 am
Booker, Johnson v. [read post]
1 Mar 2018, 7:06 am
Court of Appeals for the District of Columbia Circuit has held and the United States has repeatedly urged, contrary to the decision below. [read post]
26 Feb 2018, 4:32 am
For The Washington Post, Ellen Nakashima reports that the Supreme Court’s decision in United States v. [read post]
22 Feb 2018, 2:29 pm
Booker, Johnson v. [read post]
22 Feb 2018, 11:39 am
Booker, Johnson v. [read post]
22 Feb 2018, 8:04 am
United States had the earmarks of the latter. [read post]
1 Feb 2018, 9:16 am
What does Invisible Man say about the culture of the United States on the eve of Brown? [read post]
16 Jan 2018, 11:05 am
This was illustrated in a December 12, 2017 decision, United States v. [read post]
27 Dec 2017, 4:49 am
., United States District Judge for the Western District of North Carolina and Kathy Clements, The Vanishing Criminal Jury Trial: From Trial Judges to Sentencing Judge, 86 GEO. [read post]
7 Dec 2017, 8:22 am
United States. [read post]
6 Nov 2017, 6:28 am
” Booker v. [read post]
28 Sep 2017, 10:31 am
It is black-letter law, under United States v. [read post]