Search for: "United States v. Booker"
Results 101 - 120
of 846
Sorted by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
14 Oct 2020, 12:21 pm
United States. [read post]
28 Apr 2009, 4:19 pm
Here is the piece's abstract: In the 2005 case of United States v. [read post]
31 Dec 2006, 5:22 pm
United States v. [read post]
12 Aug 2008, 2:08 pm
" Here is the abstract: In Booker v. [read post]
21 Feb 2008, 6:51 am
" Here is the abstract from SSRN:Since the Supreme Court decided United States v. [read post]
22 Feb 2018, 2:29 pm
Booker, Johnson v. [read post]
13 Feb 2007, 8:00 am
There is a lot in Pickett that merits highlighting, but this paragraph may be my favorite and the most important aspect of the decision (and not just for crack cases, but for all cases):While Booker and § 3553(a) instruct sentencing courts to consider all these "multiple and vague" factors, United States v. [read post]
14 Jun 2007, 12:46 pm
United States v. [read post]
1 Aug 2007, 7:18 am
," United States v. [read post]
24 Mar 2008, 7:32 am
United States, 128 S. [read post]
22 Sep 2006, 8:43 am
" United States v. [read post]
27 Sep 2006, 2:46 am
United States v. [read post]
17 Jun 2010, 8:11 am
United States is here. [read post]
4 Aug 2008, 8:22 pm
" where there is no physical taking of the property, no enchantment is possible under United States v. [read post]
22 Jan 2007, 4:36 am
§ 841(a)(1) & (b)(1)(B)(viii).HELD: Even after United States v. [read post]
"Sentencing in Tax Cases after Booker: Striking the Right Balance between Uniformity and Discretion"
20 Mar 2014, 4:06 am
21 Jun 2005, 6:27 pm
United States, No. 04-5286 (June 20, 2005) holding that the 1 year limitations period under 2255(3) "begins to run on the date on which this Court 'initially recognized' the right asserted in an applicant's motion, not the date on which that right was made retroactive" Peter Godlberger, through a post at BOPWatch as well as his comment at Sentencing Law and Policy here, has alerted to the importance of Dodd to persons whose sentences became final before… [read post]
21 Jun 2010, 6:22 am
United States (No. 09-6338), the Court rejected the petitioner’s contention that its decision in United States v. [read post]
6 Nov 2007, 4:33 pm
Booker," and here is the full abstract:In the two years since United States v. [read post]
10 Aug 2007, 11:55 am
Today, in United States v. [read post]
