Search for: "United States v. Garner"
Results 1 - 20
of 963
Sort by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
6 May 2024, 8:39 am
Until 2016, different jurisdictions in the United States had different rules regarding art confiscated due to Nazi persecution. [read post]
3 May 2024, 10:48 am
" United States v. [read post]
30 Apr 2024, 3:12 pm
E. coli O157:H7 is one of thousands of serotypes Escherichia coli.[1] The combination of letters and numbers in the name of the E. coli O157:H7 refers to the specific antigens (proteins which provoke an antibody response) found on the body and tail or flagellum[2] respectively and distinguish it from other types of E. coli.[3] Most serotypes of E. coli are harmless and live as normal flora in the intestines of healthy humans and… [read post]
23 Apr 2024, 10:00 am
Both failed to garner the necessary votes to pass. [read post]
17 Apr 2024, 7:16 am
§ 1512) that was at issue in yesterday's oral argument in Fischer v. [read post]
16 Apr 2024, 8:42 am
., Ltd. v. [read post]
15 Apr 2024, 9:01 pm
While Custodia is subject to state prudential regulation, it is not FDIC-insured or subject to federal prudential regulation and does not have a holding company subject to Federal Reserve oversight. [read post]
5 Apr 2024, 9:05 pm
United States dissent, Congress could delegate fact-finding to the Executive Branch, but not “policy judgments. [read post]
14 Mar 2024, 10:07 am
Last week, Bayer broke its Philadelphia losing streak, with a win in Kline v. [read post]
6 Mar 2024, 3:00 am
” As More described England, the United States also is “planted thick with laws, from coast to coast. [read post]
27 Feb 2024, 8:15 am
Section 280E refers to a provision in the Internal Revenue Code (IRC) of the United States. 280E has significant implications for businesses involved in the sale of controlled substances, including marijuana (or “cannabis” under Minnesota law). [read post]
27 Feb 2024, 8:15 am
Section 280E refers to a provision in the Internal Revenue Code (IRC) of the United States. 280E has significant implications for businesses involved in the sale of controlled substances, including marijuana (or “cannabis” under Minnesota law). [read post]
23 Feb 2024, 3:39 pm
Such laws exist in the United States, however, only because Justice Stephen Field's dissent in The Slaughter-House Cases, 83 U.S. 36 (1873) garnered only four votes and not five. [read post]
14 Feb 2024, 7:11 pm
Now, climate activists have turned to something that I–and I suspect you–find of the highest value: the United States Constitution. [read post]
9 Feb 2024, 12:46 pm
On Thursday, Februrary 8, I sat in the courtroom of the Supreme Court of the United States on assignment for JURIST to hear oral arguments in Trump v. [read post]
9 Feb 2024, 11:37 am
[This is the second installment in a series about the oral argument in Trump v. [read post]
5 Feb 2024, 7:05 am
In South Africa v. [read post]
3 Feb 2024, 2:04 pm
As the Supreme Court memorably put it in the case of West Virginia State Board of Education v. [read post]
3 Feb 2024, 9:52 am
The Positions Clause [1] employs the catch-all term “office, civil or military, under the United States,” whereas the Officials Clause [2] uses the catch-all term “officer of the United States. [read post]
22 Jan 2024, 9:05 pm
SEC, 463 U.S. 646 (1983). [4] United States v. [read post]
