Search for: "United States v. Monie"
Results 81 - 100
of 441
Sorted by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
5 Dec 2015, 10:18 am
In 2012, the United State Supreme Court dealt with rights of a posthumously conceived child to the Social Security survivor’s benefits of the deceased parent in Astrue v. [read post]
8 Dec 2013, 9:02 pm
Instead, they appealed and the United States Court of Appeals reversed the district court. [read post]
22 Mar 2017, 12:37 pm
United States presents a seemingly simple statutory question. [read post]
25 Oct 2008, 1:32 am
Unsurprisingly, perhaps, the judgment stated that there was no prevailing party. [read post]
8 Jul 2007, 10:48 pm
Per Jackson v. [read post]
16 Jun 2011, 6:20 am
Ferrer, United States Attorney for the Southern District of Florida, John V. [read post]
16 Jun 2011, 6:20 am
Ferrer, United States Attorney for the Southern District of Florida, John V. [read post]
11 Jan 2013, 8:01 am
Thus, despite a judicial finding that Calcasieu Parish had “ample funding … with substantial monies in reserve,” the Louisiana Supreme Court found (in a different 2005 case, State v. [read post]
17 Mar 2009, 10:21 am
See United States v. [read post]
21 Aug 2022, 8:40 pm
Apache Stronghold v USA, 38 F. 4th 742 (6/242/2022) [read post]
Public Records, Public University and Sexual Assault – Which Laws Hold Sway?: By S. Dean Michaux, JD
24 Jun 2020, 8:37 am
The Supremacy Clause of the Constitution of the United States provides that “the laws of the United States, the Constitution and treaties “shall be the supreme Law of the land. [read post]
1 Sep 2012, 6:00 am
With one strategic maneuver, the plaintiffs in the O'Bannon v. [read post]
24 Jun 2008, 1:04 pm
V. [read post]
13 Jan 2011, 6:15 pm
In United States v. [read post]
23 Nov 2014, 9:01 pm
The husband immigrated to the United States from Ireland in 1984 and began working as a handyman. [read post]
24 Dec 2015, 8:20 am
The United States may intervene in such an action as it did here. [read post]
10 Jul 2014, 3:44 am
Shupe v. [read post]
12 May 2020, 9:00 pm
Do South Dakota v. [read post]
24 Mar 2017, 10:16 am
§ 2462 sets a five-year limitations period for claims seeking certain sanctions and states: Except as otherwise provided by Act of Congress, an action, suit or proceeding for the enforcement of any civil fine, penalty, or forfeiture, pecuniary or otherwise, shall not be entertained unless commenced within five years from the date when the claim first accrued if, within the same period, the offender or the property is found within the United States in order that… [read post]
18 Apr 2013, 5:40 am
The United States Supreme Court issued an opinion earlier this week in an ERISA case regarding the breadth of Section 502(a)(3) relief, and the common-fund doctrine. [read post]
