Search for: "United States v. Riley"
Results 1 - 20
of 734
Sort by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
24 Apr 2024, 5:57 am
The United States, like many other functioning democracies, is hardly immune from backsliding and lurching toward autocracy. [read post]
10 Apr 2024, 8:37 am
INA § 212(a)(6)(A)(i) states that “An alien present in the United States without being admitted or paroled . . . is inadmissible”, and the BIA held in Matter of V-X-, 26 I&N Dec. 147 (BIA 2013) , that a grant of asylum is not an “admission” for these purposes, leaving asylees subject to the grounds of inadmissibility (although with the proviso that they cannot be removed unless their asylum status is terminated). [read post]
27 Mar 2024, 5:26 pm
In Riley v. [read post]
8 Mar 2024, 6:02 pm
If the United States walks away, it will put Ukraineat risk. [read post]
2 Mar 2024, 1:04 pm
This is the same mistake that the initial Fifth Circuit panel made in United States v. [read post]
27 Feb 2024, 10:30 am
Pott v. [read post]
8 Feb 2024, 4:09 pm
Nothing in the post-2013 Act case law suggests that the section 3(3) requirement is any less permissive (see, for example, the first instance decision in Butt v Secretary of State [2017] EWHC 2619 (QB), and particularly Mr Justice Nicol’s comments at [39]. [read post]
11 Jan 2024, 9:05 pm
Riley v. [read post]
15 Nov 2023, 3:00 am
” United States v. [read post]
27 Oct 2023, 6:02 am
E. coli O157:H7 is one of thousands of serotypes Escherichia coli.[1] The combination of letters and numbers in the name of the E. coli O157:H7 refers to the specific antigens (proteins which provoke an antibody response) found on the body and tail or flagellum[2]respectively and distinguish it from other types of E. coli.[3] Most serotypes of E. coli are harmless and live as normal flora in the intestines of healthy humans and… [read post]
26 Oct 2023, 7:01 am
B.L., and People v. [read post]
17 Oct 2023, 9:23 am
Riley case, where we challenged a Georgia tax on adult entertainment establishments on First Amendment/free speech grounds. [read post]
23 Sep 2023, 7:21 pm
Worldwide, non-O157 STEC outbreaks emerged in the 1980s, and the first reported outbreaks in the United States occurred in the 1990s. [57, 55] The number of reported outbreaks due to non-O157 STECs remains relatively low in the United States, but experts agree that documented outbreaks probably represent the “tip of the iceberg. [read post]
19 Sep 2023, 8:09 am
Riley, 76 F.4th 259 (August 4, 2023). [read post]
25 Aug 2023, 5:00 am
In the case of Medical Associates of Erie v. [read post]
17 Jul 2023, 1:02 am
On 11 July 2023 there was a hearing in the Haverfordwest District Registry case of Gammon v Riley. [read post]
13 Jul 2023, 5:51 pm
All of this is a wind-up to say that, last week, the Maryland Supreme Court ruled on both questions in considerable detail in an important new case, State v. [read post]
19 Jun 2023, 2:00 am
On Tuesday 13 June 2023, there was pre-trial review in the case of Gammon v Riley before Nicklin J. [read post]
14 Jun 2023, 5:01 am
Pott v. [read post]
9 Jun 2023, 9:07 am
Worldwide, non-O157 STEC outbreaks emerged in the 1980s, and the first reported outbreaks in the United States occurred in the 1990s. [57, 55] The number of reported outbreaks due to non-O157 STECs remains relatively low in the United States, but experts agree that documented outbreaks probably represent the “tip of the iceberg. [read post]
