Search for: "United States v. Slaughter" Results 121 - 140 of 368
Sorted by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
On January 9, 2019, the United States District Court for the Southern District of Iowa declared this law unconstitutional in Animal Legal Defense Fund v. [read post]
16 Jul 2012, 10:50 am by Julian Ku
  It is a law of the United States, which authorizes courts to apply domestic American law to activities with some substantial connection to the United States. [read post]
27 May 2017, 1:56 pm by Josh Blackman
Reading the Fourth Circuit’s en banc opinion in International Refugee Assistance Project v. [read post]
8 May 2016, 7:01 am
As pointed out in the above extract, even in United States the doctrine is currently of doubtful legitimacy. [read post]
5 Mar 2010, 11:24 am by Anna Christensen
  And a second piece at Balkinization today argues that instead of overturning the Slaughter-House Cases, as the petitioners suggested, the Court should overturn its 1875 decision in United States v. [read post]
16 May 2022, 9:04 pm by Dan Flynn
A “Certificate of Service” is signed by Miller “under the laws of the United States of America, without of the United States (Federal and State Government). [read post]
7 Dec 2023, 1:30 am by Sherica Celine
In short, it is now black-letter law in the United States that personal information can only be collected for disclosed and contextually relevant purposes. [read post]
7 Oct 2023, 6:38 am by jonathanturley
Now Newsom has quietly signed the repeal of the law after it was headed for an almost certain rejection by the United States Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit. [read post]
15 Sep 2010, 6:33 am by houndedcowed
Also mentioned are SCOTUS's invalidation of an anti-cruelty law in United States v. [read post]
4 Jul 2012, 5:53 am by Rosalind English
Switzerland (no. 2) no. 32772/02, § 92, ECHR 2009 (rearing of animals)[Grand Chamber- GC]; Steel and Morris v . the United Kingdom, no. 68416/01, §§ 89 and 95, ECHR 2005-II (fast-food meat industry); Hashman and Harrup v . the United Kingdom[GC], no. 25594/94 (hunting saboteurs); Steel and Others v . the United Kingdom, 23 September 1998 (hunting saboteurs); Bladet Tromsø and Stensaas v . [read post]
8 Dec 2021, 3:20 am by Matrix Legal Support Service
The background facts concerned a slaughtered bull which was declared by the Official Veterinarian (“OV”) on behalf of the respondent as meat unfit for human consumption. [read post]