Search for: "United States v. Stark, et al"
Results 1 - 20
of 81
Sort by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
27 Jan 2024, 2:29 pm
(Marko Milanovic, ICJ Indicates Provisional Measures in South Africa v. [read post]
11 Oct 2023, 6:54 am
Cardiac Imaging Inc., et al., No. 18-cv-2674 (S.D. [read post]
18 Sep 2023, 6:17 pm
Winborne, et al., C.A. [read post]
St. Francis Health System, Inc. pays $36.5 million to settle False Claims Act and Anti-kickback case
16 Jun 2023, 8:32 am
The lawsuit resolved by this settlement is captioned United States of America, et al., ex rel. [read post]
24 Apr 2023, 7:00 am
And this leaves constitutional democracy in the United States with knowledge deficits and democratic deficits in its operation and legitimation – and more vulnerable to anti-democratic and illiberal forces, autocratic threats, and political violence. [read post]
13 Feb 2023, 5:59 am
[viii] The Chancery Court’s decision in the P3 Health Group Litigation decision is a stark reminder of the need for private equity sponsors to observe corporate formalities with respect to their portfolio companies. [read post]
5 Feb 2023, 3:10 pm
In Société Nationale Industrielle Aérospatiale v. [read post]
1 Feb 2023, 9:01 pm
Before 1929, all securities markets in the United States were private and thus, dark. [read post]
2 Aug 2022, 6:30 am
Consider the now infamous case, United States v. [read post]
28 Jun 2022, 7:13 am
For example, he raises and explains the problem encountered for causal inference by small relative risks: “Small relative risks of the order of 2:1 or even less are what are likely to be observed, like the risk now recorded for childhood leukemia and exposure to magnetic fields of 0.4 µT or more (Ahlbom et al. 2000) that are seldom encountered in the United Kingdom. [read post]
27 May 2022, 5:30 pm
The qui tam case is captioned United States, et al. ex rel. [read post]
26 May 2022, 11:30 am
The qui tam case is captioned United States, et al. ex rel. [read post]
19 Mar 2022, 4:52 am
Stark in Natera, Inc. v. [read post]
12 Mar 2021, 1:26 pm
Stark in Diebold Nixdorf, Inc. et al. v. [read post]
24 Feb 2020, 7:01 am
United States v. [read post]
28 Jan 2020, 9:58 pm
Azar, et al, No 18 –CV-0040 (D>D.C. [read post]
24 Jan 2020, 4:57 am
City of Columbus, et al. [read post]
1 Nov 2019, 9:01 am
Targeted infrastructure funding is partly addressed by a Senate appropriations bill that devotes $690 million in fiscal year (FY) 2020 funding for the United States Department of Agriculture (USDA) Rural Utilities Service (RUS) broadband loan and grant programs (presumably including the ReConnect program). [read post]
4 Jun 2019, 10:34 am
Doctor’s Choice Home Care Inc., et al., Case No. 8:15-cv-01044 (M.D. [read post]
26 Mar 2019, 10:25 am
District Court for the Western District of Louisiana held that a unit operator may not recover post-production costs from an unleased mineral owner’s share of production proceeds in Allen Johnson, et al. v. [read post]
