Search for: "United States v. Two Firearms Seized"
Results 141 - 160
of 269
Sorted by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
7 Jan 2021, 8:28 am
So the most relevant prohibition is Section 2384, which outlaws “seditious conspiracy,” defined as when “two or more persons ... conspire to overthrow, put down, or to destroy by force the Government of the United States ... or to oppose by force the authority thereof, or by force to prevent, hinder, or delay the execution of any law of the United States, or by force to seize, take, or possess any property of the United… [read post]
24 Aug 2011, 9:20 am
Attorney for the Southern District of Florida; John V. [read post]
24 Aug 2011, 9:20 am
Attorney for the Southern District of Florida; John V. [read post]
26 Jun 2014, 7:53 am
California and United States v. [read post]
27 Jul 2019, 9:43 am
" Finally, citing the First Step Act, Wiseman argued the District Court erred in finding he was a career offender under the Guidelines because he had served less than a year imprisonment on each of his supposedly qualifying charges.In its decision in United States v. [read post]
24 Feb 2012, 11:44 am
“Under the majority’s test,” Justice Sotomayor wrote, “four wrongs apparently make a right.” Conclusion In largely sidestepping the second, broader question on which certiorari was granted – whether Malley and its exclusionary-rule corollary, United States v. [read post]
18 Nov 2020, 8:57 am
” United States v. [read post]
5 Jun 2018, 12:33 pm
In United States v. [read post]
2 Jun 2019, 7:11 am
The District Court denied his motion, finding that the warrant was supported by probable cause, and, even if it was not so supported, the Leon good faith exception applied.In United States v. [read post]
23 Jun 2019, 4:17 am
The United States, thanks to Alabama, just joined that list. [read post]
22 Jul 2022, 4:00 am
Heller) and 23 June 2022 (New York State Rifle and Pistol Association v. [read post]
7 Jun 2021, 7:29 pm
ShareOn Tuesday in United States v. [read post]
12 Oct 2017, 12:00 pm
Since the Supreme Court’s 1936 decision in United States v. [read post]
28 Jun 2018, 9:01 pm
In this regard, New York v. [read post]
17 Jul 2013, 5:19 am
Christine Wright–Darrisaw, against the President of the United States. [read post]
31 Mar 2017, 7:27 am
`”The Fifth Amendment to the United States Constitution states that ‘[n]o person . . . shall be compelled in any criminal case to be a witness against himself. . . . [read post]
22 Feb 2018, 4:12 am
United States, which asks when erroneous applications of the U.S. [read post]
16 Feb 2020, 11:31 pm
United States v. [read post]
10 Jun 2008, 2:36 pm
Rowan, No. 05-30536 On remand from the Supreme Court of the United States, a 60-month sentence of supervised release following a conviction for possession of child pornography is affirmed where: 1) defendant's sentence is a non-Guideline sentence since it falls outside the applicable range and was not based on an allowed departure; but 2) in light of the deferential standard set forth in Gall, there was no significant procedural error in the sentencing decision. [read post]
10 Nov 2010, 7:33 am
[They] seized numerous items, including . . . six computers, multiple USB thumb drives, USB cables, a Sony Playstation, two digital cameras, multiple external hard drives, a cassette recorder, two USB cameras, numerous compact discs, a pair of handcuffs, condoms, three marijuana pipes, a handgun, ammunition, and over seventy grams of marijuana. [read post]
