Search for: "United States v. Two Firearms Seized"
Results 141 - 160
of 269
Sort by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
24 Aug 2014, 4:34 pm
United States v. [read post]
14 Aug 2014, 6:59 am
Every year now, there are approximately 50,000 SWAT raids in the United States, according to Professor Pete Kraska of Eastern Kentucky University's School of Justice Studies. [read post]
6 Aug 2014, 5:15 am
Supreme Court “issued a unanimous Opinion” in two consolidated cases: U.S. v. [read post]
1 Aug 2014, 5:31 am
The University of Michigan moves to dismiss this claim, arguing that, as a Michigan state department, it is entitled to immunity from suit under the 11th Amendment.The 11th Amendment provides, in relevant part: `The judicial power of the United States shall not be construed to extend to any suit in law or equity, commenced or prosecuted against one of the United States by Citizens of another State[.] [read post]
21 Jul 2014, 5:43 am
JohnsonAC35451 - State v. [read post]
18 Jul 2014, 5:49 am
United States Supreme Court decisions that deal with constitutional issues apply to every state. [read post]
15 Jul 2014, 5:59 pm
California and United States v. [read post]
13 Jul 2014, 7:35 am
.)United States v. [read post]
11 Jul 2014, 11:15 am
In United States v. [read post]
30 Jun 2014, 9:01 pm
California together with United States v. [read post]
30 Jun 2014, 2:37 pm
United States v. [read post]
26 Jun 2014, 8:07 am
United States. [read post]
26 Jun 2014, 7:53 am
California and United States v. [read post]
30 May 2014, 8:02 am
In United States v. [read post]
14 Apr 2014, 5:38 am
State v. [read post]
14 Feb 2014, 2:29 am
The United States Supreme Court is scheduled to issue landmark decisions early this summer regarding the constitutionality of a warrantless search of a suspect's cell phone under the Fourth Amendment. [read post]
21 Jan 2014, 10:26 am
Arizona V. [read post]
21 Jan 2014, 10:26 am
Arizona V. [read post]
21 Jan 2014, 10:26 am
Arizona V. [read post]
11 Nov 2013, 10:00 am
With exquisite timing, the Court of Appeals lays it out for us.The case is United States v. [read post]
