Search for: "Unknown Defendant No. 5"
Results 61 - 80
of 1,388
Sorted by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
2 Jul 2011, 8:30 am
§ 1125(a)):Here Zynga alleges that the defendants have used the mark to falsely represent that the defendants are affiliated with Zynga in a way that’s likely to cause confusion as to Zynga’s true association with the defendants and/or their products.Federal cybersquatting regarding the mark ZYNGA (15 U.S.C. [read post]
17 Nov 2012, 6:16 pm
Id. at 5-6. [read post]
29 Apr 2009, 4:16 pm
As a further, direct and proximate result of Defendants' violation of California Government Code § 12900, et. seq. , as heretofore described, Plaintiff has been compelled to retain the services of counsel in an effort to enforce the terms and conditions of her employment relationship with Defendants, and has thereby incurred, and will continue to incur, legal fees and costs, the full nature and extent of which are presently unknown to her. [read post]
14 Apr 2010, 1:16 am
Apr. 5, 2010).The underlying suit concerned a feature on Hyundai’s website that allowed customers to input interests and needs and receive car recommendations and prices. [read post]
14 Apr 2010, 1:16 am
Apr. 5, 2010).The underlying suit concerned a feature on Hyundai’s website that allowed customers to input interests and needs and receive car recommendations and prices. [read post]
30 Jan 2017, 11:56 am
A deficient indictment fails to adequately allow a defendant to defend himself.2. [read post]
19 Dec 2014, 6:30 am
Mar. 5, 2014) (J. [read post]
2 Dec 2012, 2:27 pm
Id. at *5, *7; see also id. at 5 * & n.2 (“Given the totality of the circumstances, it seems our Chief Judge would have been diving alone into the nearest ditch. [read post]
24 Sep 2010, 1:45 pm
It is unknown if it is even available for inspection. [read post]
24 May 2013, 12:51 pm
Relf involves a conflict between subsections (b) and (c) of 735 ILCS 5/13-209. [read post]
24 Dec 2012, 8:44 am
See, Defendant's motion dated May 30, 2012, p 5, para 10. [read post]
28 Sep 2021, 4:15 am
Master Cook commented at paragraph 39 of his judgment that had Trustpilot been named as a defendant in the proceedings, it would have had recourse to a defence under section 5(2) of the Defamation Act 2013 – namely that it was not itself the party that posted the defamatory statement. [read post]
12 May 2011, 3:38 am
They went to the store and talked to the defendant security guard and asked for ID. [read post]
9 Aug 2010, 10:10 am
The Court also examined the meaning of s. 5(1) within the context of other provisions of the Act and noted that provisions relating to an unknown owner or operator required that person to be the tortfeasor. [read post]
15 Mar 2010, 4:03 pm
It was the applicant himself who defended his application (the professional representatives had withdrawn, for reasons unknown).The notice of appeal was handwritten and very short; it read:The Board sent the appellant a communication stating that the appeal was likely to be rejected as inadmissible and giving him the opportunity to present arguments. [read post]
11 Nov 2007, 2:00 am
Defendants are 11 unknown entities ("Does 1-11"). [read post]
7 Oct 2010, 11:06 am
" The defendant, challenging a punitive damages award of $5 million, raises questions about the application of the due process limitations on excessive punitive damages in cases involving intentional harm and nominal damages: 1. [read post]
24 Mar 2014, 2:37 am
March 5, 2014). [read post]
2 Feb 2007, 3:07 pm
The application requested a nighttime search "to prevent the loss, destruction or removal of the objects of the search because ... it is unknown when the person described herein will be at the premises described herein. [read post]
11 Dec 2013, 12:13 pm
The second report had concluded that the risk of subsidence was unquantifiable due to multiple unknown variables. [read post]
