Search for: "Unknown Defendants 1 -10" Results 41 - 60 of 1,496
Sorted by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
1 Sep 2008, 2:22 pm
LEXIS 391 (August 29, 2008): The observed nervous behavior by an unknown person standing next to and conversing with a known drug suspect gave police a "hunch" that the unknown person might be involved with the target of their investigation. [read post]
26 Aug 2018, 10:05 am by Stephen M. Ozcomert
The defendant sued under OCGA § 33-7-11 (d) (1) of that statute, which states that a John Doe defendant’s home will be presumed to be the county where an injury-producing accident happens or the plaintiff’s home county. [read post]
29 Aug 2019, 5:00 am by Daniel E. Cummins
  The certified mail return receipt for one (1) Defendant was signed by a person with a different first name and with no last name listed. [read post]
24 Aug 2017, 8:10 pm by Jamie Markham
Additionally, the defendant’s whereabouts were not unknown—because he was wearing an electronic house arrest monitor. [read post]
15 Jun 2009, 8:36 am
The true names and capacities, whether individual, corporate, associate or otherwise, of Defendants sued herein as DOES 1 through 100, inclusive, are currently unknown to PLAINTIFFS, who therefore sue said Defendants by such fictitious names. [read post]
13 Jul 2015, 8:52 am
’The child pornography charges alleged that defendant:`with the knowledge of the nature thereof, possessed a depiction by computer of an unknown child which the defendant knew or reasonably should have known to be under the age of 18, which showed the unknown child urinating in a bathroom. [read post]
28 May 2014, 4:26 pm by Ray Beckerman
Does 1-1058, the appeals court overruled the district court's grant of ex parte discovery, ruling that mass John Doe cases could not be brought where there was no known basis for the assertion of personal jurisdiction over the unknown defendants, and on alternative grounds that there could be no joinder merely because defendants allegedly downloaded the same file through BitTorrent and therefore possibly in the same "swarm". [read post]
22 May 2011, 9:33 pm
The whereabouts of the truck’s driver were unknown, the passenger of the truck refused to provide any information or explanation as to what he was doing, and Roarick had seen another individual, the defendant, wearing a hooded garment, run behind a house near where the truck was located. [read post]
5 Oct 2010, 1:44 am
Harker, 2010 UT 56, 2010 Utah LEXIS 154 (September 28, 2010).* Reasonable suspicion found for a dog sniff where defendant had an Arizona driver’s license but the vehicle bore Iowa plates, where: the truck was registered to a third party, neither defendant nor his passenger knew the owner’s name despite being in the middle of an extended journey from Arizona to an unknown location in Iowa, neither could identify their destination other than “Iowa,”… [read post]
6 Jul 2017, 7:50 pm by Allan Blutstein
.) -- ruling that: (1) IRS failed to demonstrate that it performed reasonable search for responsive records; (2) IRS properly withheld records pursuant to Exemptions 5, 7(A), and 7(D); (3) IRS failed to address whether "Risk Score" withheld under Exemption 7(E) was technique unknown to public; and (4)  judgment would be reserved as to Exemptions 3, 6, and 7(C) until record was further developed.Frost v. [read post]
17 Apr 2014, 8:54 pm by Eric Goldman
Photo credit: enameled house number two hundred and thirty // ShutterStockThe pro se plaintiff alleges that unknown Does defamed him. [read post]
11 Jan 2015, 6:48 pm by Jeremy Saland
Forde, the defendants Forde and Snow, along with an unknown third male, entered a Bloomingdale’s department store in midtown Manhattan and made five purchases totaling over three thousand dollars. [read post]