Search for: "Unknown Named Agents of the Federal Bureau of Investigation" Results 1 - 20 of 68
Sorted by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
17 Jun 2022, 10:57 am by DONALD SCARINCI
Six Unknown Named Agents of Federal Bureau of Narcotics, 403 U.S. 388 (1971), does not extend to either a Fourth Amendment excessive-force claim or First Amendment retaliation claim against U.S. [read post]
16 Sep 2020, 8:19 am by Ambrosio Rodriguez
According to a story in the Los Angeles Times, the Federal Bureau of Investigations (FBI) opened an investigation into Guan Lei in July. [read post]
8 Jun 2011, 12:36 pm by McNabb Associates, P.C.
Franco Unknown Mexico Tonio Last Name Unknown Unknown Mexico If convicted, each defendant faces up to life in federal prison. [read post]
8 Jun 2011, 12:36 pm by McNabb Associates, P.C.
Franco Unknown Mexico Tonio Last Name Unknown Unknown Mexico If convicted, each defendant faces up to life in federal prison. [read post]
10 Feb 2017, 7:56 am by The Federalist Society
Six Unknown Named Agents of Federal Bureau of Narcotics, erred by defining “context” at too high a level of generality; (2) whether the Second Circuit erred in denying qualified immunity to Defendant Ziglar; and (3) whether the Second Circuit erred in holding that Plaintiffs’ Fourth Amendment Complaint met the pleading requirements identified by the Supreme Court in its 2009 decision in Ashcroft v. [read post]
7 Sep 2011, 4:00 am by Terry Hart
Six Unknown Named Agents of the Federal Bureau of Narcotics, 403 U.S. 388 (1971), under which an individual may bring a cause of action “against a federal agent who, while acting under the color of federal law, has violated the constitutional rights of [the] individual. [read post]
30 Oct 2012, 9:58 am by Irene
Instead, federal law enforcement officers lost track of hundreds of weapons which have been used in an unknown number of crimes. [read post]
29 Aug 2018, 2:30 pm
Six Unknown Named Agents of Federal Bureau of Narcotics, in which the Supreme Court held that citizens whose constitutional rights were violated are entitled to seek a legal remedy. [read post]
14 Sep 2020, 8:41 am by Nathaniel Sobel
” Much remains unknown about Durham’s work. [read post]
14 Mar 2012, 3:40 am by Kim Zetter
NSLs are a powerful tool because an FBI agent looking into a possible anti-terrorism case can essentially self-issue the NSL to a credit bureau, ISP or phone company with only the sign-off of the Special Agent in Charge of their office. [read post]
24 Feb 2018, 5:27 pm by Quinta Jurecic, Benjamin Wittes
Agents interviewed Page “multiple times” before the FBI became aware of the Steele dossier in September 2016, including in March of that year—the same month Trump named Page as a campaign adviser. [read post]
7 Jan 2022, 3:00 am by Jim Sedor
National/Federal Bureau of Prisons Director to Resign After Scandal-Plagued Tenure During Pandemic MSN – Brian Pietsch and Matt Zapotosky (Washington Post) | Published: 1/6/2022 Michael Carvajal, the director of the U.S. [read post]
10 May 2012, 3:58 pm by Kim Zetter
An FBI agent looking into a possible anti-terrorism case can essentially self-issue the NSL to a credit bureau, ISP or phone company with only the sign-off of the Special Agent in Charge of their office. [read post]
18 Mar 2016, 8:49 am by Nicholas B. Lewis
Six Unknown Named Agents of Federal Bureau of Narcotics, the Supreme Court held that a victim of a Fourth Amendment violation by federal agents had a right to pursue damages from those agents despite any statute expressly conferring such a right. [read post]
18 Mar 2016, 8:49 am by Nicholas B. Lewis
Six Unknown Named Agents of Federal Bureau of Narcotics, the Supreme Court held that a victim of a Fourth Amendment violation by federal agents had a right to pursue damages from those agents despite any statute expressly conferring such a right. [read post]
18 Mar 2016, 8:49 am by Nicholas B. Lewis
Six Unknown Named Agents of Federal Bureau of Narcotics, the Supreme Court held that a victim of a Fourth Amendment violation by federal agents had a right to pursue damages from those agents despite any statute expressly conferring such a right. [read post]