Search for: "Unnamed v. Unnamed" Results 21 - 40 of 1,217
Sorted by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
26 Jul 2012, 5:00 am by Kimberly A. Kralowec
In an unpublished opinion, the Court of Appeal (Second Appellate District, Division Seven) held again that orders denying class certification do not have collateral estoppel effect as to unnamed class members: We agree with Bridgeford [v. [read post]
16 Jun 2011, 10:50 am by WISCONSIN LAW JOURNAL STAFF
Civil Procedure Class actions; privity A denial of class certifications is not binding on unnamed putative class members. [read post]
7 Aug 2012, 2:12 pm
An as yet unnamed Good Samaritan vessel took on the four crewmembers. [read post]
7 Aug 2012, 2:12 pm
An as yet unnamed Good Samaritan vessel took on the four crewmembers. [read post]
2 Sep 2011, 5:00 am by Kimberly A. Kralowec
The Ninth Circuit has handed down an important class certification decision, Stearns v. [read post]
20 Oct 2017, 12:53 pm by Matthew Kahn
James Mattis, the ACLU's suit on behalf of the unnamed American citizen being held as an enemy combatant by the U.S. military. [read post]
7 Apr 2016, 5:18 pm by Daily Record Staff
Torts — Suit against county detention center — Governmental immunity This case arises from a complaint filed in the Circuit Court for Montgomery County by Dion Jones, appellant, alleging that he was injured by “John Doe,” an unnamed corrections officer, while incarcerated in the Montgomery County Detention Center (the “Detention Center”). [read post]
27 Aug 2009, 6:32 am
Filed May 21, 2009.Opinion by Judge Mary Beth McCormick.Held: Unnamed co-owner of a business was entitled to one half of the net proceeds from the sale of the business, despite the lack of agreement or "paper trail" evidencing ownership, because an implied-in-fact contract existed between the co-owners. [read post]
1 Dec 2017, 1:08 pm by Garrett Hinck
Mattis for the government to say whether the unnamed American citizen detainee being held as an enemy combatant had requested counsel and whether he invoked his right to habeas corpus. [read post]
1 Jun 2015, 12:39 pm by Jaclyn Belczyk
The US Supreme Court [official website] ruled [opinion, PDF] 7-2 Monday in Mellouli v. [read post]