Search for: "Urban Outfitters Inc" Results 41 - 60 of 67
Sorted by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
9 Jun 2020, 7:00 am by Second Circuit Civil Rights Blog
Urban Outfitters, Inc., 921 F.3d 30 (2d Cir. 2019), which issued during the briefing of this appeal, reminding us once again that you should keep up with the latest developments in the Court of Appeals and elsewhere, as today's court rulings can help you tomorrow.The holding on this issue is that "time-barred evidence constitutes non-discrete acts that are sufficiently related to the acts that occurred within the limitations period, and that acts involved the… [read post]
26 Nov 2010, 3:01 pm by IP Dragon
., Inc., Leo Valencia, Urban Outfitters, Inc., and Target Corporation for unfair competition and trademark infringement under federal statutes (Lanham Act), with pendent claims for common-law trademark infringement and unauthorised commercial use of statutory (California and Indiana's right of publicity statutes) and common law right of publicity, because they used a picture of Bruce Lee in clothing.The defendants claimed that the U.S. [read post]
11 Aug 2011, 3:40 am by Maxwell Kennerly
s beef with satire site WTForever21 or Urban Outfitters seemingly grabbing local artists’ designs. [read post]
3 Apr 2012, 2:37 pm by Lara
Sorry I was Gone So Long (& a Look at Sorry Trademarks) Navajo Nation Fights Urban Outfitters over Tacky Trademark Infringement LIKE Controversy? [read post]
9 Dec 2014, 10:06 am by Greg Mersol
We’ve blogged about some of the prior litigation in this arena, including lawsuits against clothing retailer Urban Outfitters and Apple, which you can read about here. [read post]
15 Jul 2012, 9:39 am by Lara
    Related Posts: Sorry I was Gone So Long (& a Look at Sorry Trademarks) Navajo Nation Fights Urban Outfitters over Tacky Trademark Infringement A Trademark Attorney’s Mission to get Jon Stewart High Timsane Linsanity at the USPTO! [read post]
6 Jun 2019, 2:52 pm by Jonathan Bailey
Urban Outfitters, Inc., where the plaintiff inadvertently excluded source artwork from the registration application. [read post]