Search for: "Utility Air Regulatory Group v. EPA"
Results 61 - 80
of 207
Sort by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
25 Mar 2015, 8:55 am
EPA; Linked with: Utility Air Regulatory Group v. [read post]
24 Mar 2015, 1:56 pm
EPA and Utility Air Regulatory Group v. [read post]
23 Mar 2015, 9:03 am
Oral argument scheduled for Mar 25, 2015 -- Linked with: Utility Air Regulatory Group v. [read post]
3 Mar 2015, 8:58 am
For instance, they properly cite the Court’s opinion from last term in Utility Air Regulatory Group v. [read post]
2 Mar 2015, 6:42 am
So let’s cast aside the red herring of untethered purpose, and ask the question that gives King significance beyond the politics of health reform (and is a reason for the Court to avoid those politics): Will the Court follow, what Justice Scalia just five months ago (in Utility Air Regulatory Group v. [read post]
5 Feb 2015, 8:50 am
Environmental Protection Agency, Utility Air Regulatory Group v. [read post]
19 Jan 2015, 12:22 pm
The EPA requires farmers to follow disposal instructions provided by the pesticide manufacturer. [read post]
4 Dec 2014, 11:05 am
EPA, 14-46, Utility Air Regulatory Group v. [read post]
2 Dec 2014, 3:14 am
Jacobs covers last week’s grant in a trio of cases – brought by Michigan, the National Mining Association, and the Utility Air Regulatory Group – presenting the question “whether EPA should have taken into account compliance costs before proceeding with . . regulations” intended to limit power plants’ emissions of (among other things) mercury. [read post]
26 Nov 2014, 8:50 am
EPA, Utility Air Regulatory Group v. [read post]
26 Nov 2014, 8:44 am
EPA, Utility Air Regulatory Group v. [read post]
25 Nov 2014, 10:39 am
EPA, Utility Air Regulatory Group v. [read post]
19 Nov 2014, 12:58 pm
EPA, 14-46, Utility Air Regulatory Group v. [read post]
10 Nov 2014, 7:51 am
” Same true if the question came to us via the Clean Air Act, because as Justice Scalia explained just last Term in Utility Air Regulatory Group v. [read post]
9 Nov 2014, 5:55 pm
No one disputes that, as Justice Antonin Scalia wrote last Term in Utility Air Regulatory Group v. [read post]
7 Nov 2014, 9:48 am
So let’s cast aside the red herring of untethered purpose, and ask the question that gives King significance beyond the politics of health reform (and is a reason for the Court to avoid those politics): Will the Court follow, what Justice Scalia just five months ago (in Utility Air Regulatory Group v. [read post]
6 Oct 2014, 8:45 am
Supreme Court refused to hear legal challenges to the national, health-based air quality standard for ground-level ozone (Docket No. 13-1235, Utility Air Regulatory Group (UARG) v. [read post]
30 Sep 2014, 12:24 pm
Air Regulatory Group v. [read post]
10 Sep 2014, 9:00 am
Utility Air Regulatory Group v. [read post]
9 Sep 2014, 9:30 pm
Environmental Protection Agency’s (EPA) position in the case Utility Air Regulatory Group v. [read post]
