Search for: "Utility Air Regulatory Group v. EPA"
Results 161 - 180
of 207
Sorted by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
19 Nov 2014, 12:58 pm
EPA, 14-46, Utility Air Regulatory Group v. [read post]
19 Jul 2010, 3:37 pm
Vol. 2, No. 20, July 19, 2010 The following is a summary review of articles from all over the nation concerning environmental law settlements, decisions, regulatory actions and lawsuits filed during the past week. [read post]
30 Apr 2007, 8:03 am
New York (06-736) and Utility Air Regulatory Group v. [read post]
5 Jul 2022, 2:47 pm
Oregon, Utility Air Regulatory Group v. [read post]
24 Jun 2014, 5:20 am
In Utility Air Regulatory Group v. [read post]
26 Jul 2010, 9:08 am
The utility will also pay up to $100,000 for consultants – picked jointly by the utility and the activists — to critique the plan and advise the activists about any new problems. [read post]
16 Jun 2022, 9:05 pm
Second, we present evidence on public-company disclosures consistent with issuers’ understanding that the SEC has long had authority to take regulatory action in this area. [read post]
25 Jun 2015, 12:16 pm
Utility Air Regulatory Group v. [read post]
2 Dec 2014, 3:14 am
Jacobs covers last week’s grant in a trio of cases – brought by Michigan, the National Mining Association, and the Utility Air Regulatory Group – presenting the question “whether EPA should have taken into account compliance costs before proceeding with . . regulations” intended to limit power plants’ emissions of (among other things) mercury. [read post]
13 Sep 2010, 8:43 am
But his administration’s decision on this case, Connecticut v. [read post]
26 Aug 2021, 9:37 pm
We expect Congress to speak clearly when authorizing an agency to exercise powers of "vast 'economic and political significance.'" Utility Air Regulatory Group v. [read post]
2 Jul 2014, 12:40 pm
United States Utility Air Regulatory Group v. [read post]
29 Jun 2021, 4:26 pm
See Utility Air Regulatory Group v. [read post]
2 Mar 2015, 6:42 am
So let’s cast aside the red herring of untethered purpose, and ask the question that gives King significance beyond the politics of health reform (and is a reason for the Court to avoid those politics): Will the Court follow, what Justice Scalia just five months ago (in Utility Air Regulatory Group v. [read post]
17 Jul 2020, 3:00 am
AIR QUALITY AND CLIMATE CHANGE 1. [read post]
29 Jun 2021, 4:46 pm
See Utility Air Regulatory Group v. [read post]
10 Sep 2014, 9:00 am
Utility Air Regulatory Group v. [read post]
7 Nov 2014, 9:48 am
So let’s cast aside the red herring of untethered purpose, and ask the question that gives King significance beyond the politics of health reform (and is a reason for the Court to avoid those politics): Will the Court follow, what Justice Scalia just five months ago (in Utility Air Regulatory Group v. [read post]
1 Jun 2016, 10:48 am
The Court’s choice not even to discuss deference may thus reflect what some commentators have perceived as an anti-deference mood in recent Roberts Court opinions (such as Utility Air Regulatory Group v. [read post]
1 Jul 2023, 3:49 am
Id., at ___, ___ (quoting Utility Air Regulatory Group v. [read post]
