Search for: "V D" Results 101 - 120 of 75,780
Sorted by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
17 Dec 2009, 4:33 am
Mahad v Entry Clearance Officer; Ali and another v Same; Ismail and another v Same; Sakthivel v Same; Muhumed v Same (Equality and Human Rights Commission intervening) [2009] UKSC 16; [2009] WLR (D) 367 "Financial support provided by third parties could be taken into account when considering whether a person who was seeking leave to enter [...] [read post]
30 Apr 2010, 2:56 am by traceydennis
HH (Somalia) v Secretary of State for the Home Dept; AM (Somalia) v Same; J (Somalia) v Same; MA (Somalia) v Same; [2010] EWCA Civ 42; ; [2010] WLR (D) 107 “Where the route and manner of return of an illegal immigrant to a safe haven were known or could be implied, the first tier tribunal had to consider whether the claimant would be put at risk if returned by that route. [read post]
25 Nov 2010, 2:06 am by traceydennis
RT (Zimbabwe) v Secretary of State for the Home Department; SM (Zimbabwe) v Same; AM (Zimbabwe) v Same; DM (Zimbabwe) v Same [2010] EWCA Civ 1285; [2010] WLR (D) 295 “A claim for asylum would not be defeated if the tribunal found that a claimant would be willing to lie about political beliefs, or about the absence of political beliefs, but that the reason for the lie was to avoid persecution. [read post]
2 Aug 2010, 2:38 am by sally
Regina v B (F); Same v P (A); Same v C (J) [2010] EWCA Crim 1857; [2010] WLR (D) 21 “A judge sitting in the Crown Court had no power to quash an indictment simply because he did not believe that the proceedings were appropriately brought or were not in the public interest when compared with his assessment of the needs of other cases and that had not changed as a result of the introduction of the Criminal Procedure Rules 2010. [read post]
3 Feb 2012, 2:46 am by sally
Coogan v News Group Newspapers Ltd and another; Phillips v Same [2011] EWCA Civ 48; [2012] WLR (D) 18 “The phrase ‘technical or commercial information or other intellectual property’ within the definition of ‘intellectual property’ in section 72 of the Senior Courts Act 1981 was apt to embrace telephone voice messages said to have been intercepted by a private investigator on the telephones of individuals; and the effect of that finding was… [read post]
30 Oct 2012, 4:17 am by sally
A v A [2012] EWCA Civ 1396; [2012] WLR (D) 297 “Where children who had been born in England had been forcibly removed to another country and retained there by one parent against the wish of the other, that could not change the children’s place of habitual residence from England to the other country. [read post]
10 Oct 2013, 1:09 pm by Emmanuel Barthe
La députée Isabelle Attard, membre de la Commission des affaires culturelles de l'Assemblée, est à l'initiative de cet événement et en a assuré la co-organisation avec les membres de SavoirsCom1. [read post]
20 Mar 2012, 3:18 am by sally
JD (Congo) v Secretary of State for the Home Department (Public Law Project intervening); WN (The Gambia) v Same; ES (Iran) v Same; MR (Bangladesh) v Same [2012] EWCA Civ 327; [2012] WLR (D) 85 “Where a claimant who had succeeded before the First-tier Tribunal but failed in the Upper Tribunal sought permission to appeal from the Upper Tribunal, not on the ground of an important point of principle or practice, but for some other compelling reason… [read post]
28 Feb 2011, 2:18 am by sally
Hounslow London Borough Council v Powell; Leeds City Council v Hall; Birmingham City Council v Frisby [2011] UKSC 8; [2011] WLR (D) 64 “In all cases where a local authority was seeking possession of a property which constituted a persons home, including persons who had been granted introductory tenancies pursuant to Part V of the Housing Act 1996 and persons who had been granted a licence of property under the homelessness regime in Part VII of the… [read post]
3 Aug 2010, 3:22 am by michael
Imerman v Tchenguiz and others; Same v Imerman [2010] EWCA Civ 908; [2010] WLR (D) 217 “There was no legal justification for permitting a spouse to retain copies of documents unlawfully obtained in breach of confidence in order to prevent the other spouse from concealing assets in ancillary relief proceedings. [read post]
29 Jul 2010, 1:38 am by sally
Secretary of State for the Home Department v AF (No 4); Same v AN; Same v AE [2010] EWCA Civ 869; [2010] WLR (D) 205 “Control orders which the Secretary of State for the Home Department revoked rather than disclose the evidence on which they were made should have been quashed with effect from the dates they were made, because they were made in violation of the right to a fair trial under art 6 of the Convention for the Protection of Human Rights and… [read post]
30 Jul 2010, 2:41 am by traceydennis
Secretary of State for the Home Department v AF (No 4);  Same v AN; Same v AE [2010] EWCA Civ 869; [2010] WLR (D) 205 “Control orders which the Secretary of State for the Home Department revoked rather than disclose the evidence on which they were made should have been quashed with effect from the dates they were made, because they were made in violation of the right to a fair trial under art 6 of the Convention for the Protection of Human Rights and… [read post]
7 Apr 2011, 3:00 am by sally
Makisi v Birmingham City Council; Yosief v Same; Nagi v Same [2011] EWCA Civ 355; [2011] WLR (D) 124 “An applicant for housing under the homelessness provisions who, on an review of a decision to refuse accommodation, had a right to make oral representations where there had been a deficiency or irregularity in the original decision, could insist on a face-to-face hearing with the reviewer at which he or his representative could make representations. [read post]
19 Feb 2009, 2:25 am
RB (Algeria) v Secretary of State for the Home Department; U (Algeria) v Same; Othman v Same [2009] UKHL 10; [2009] WLR (D) 60 “Appeals from the Special Immigration Appeals Commission (’SIAC’) were restricted to matters of law or irrationality. [read post]
6 Aug 2019, 7:40 am by Daily Record Staff
Torts — Tortious interference with right of burial — Next of kin In his complaint, filed in the Circuit Court for Montgomery County, appellant, William Masters, sought damages from Philip D. [read post]