Search for: "VIKING PUMPS" Results 1 - 20 of 34
Sorted by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
15 Sep 2016, 6:59 am by Patrick M. McDermott
The Delaware Supreme Court ruled on Monday in a long-running dispute involving Viking Pump’s and Warren Pumps’ claims for recovery under primary, umbrella, and excess insurance. [read post]
12 Nov 2009, 10:59 pm
Although not within the technical bailiwick of this blog, I thought it was worthwhile to point out the Delaware Chancerty Court's recent decision in Viking Pump, Inc. v. [read post]
4 May 2016, 8:37 am by Michael S. Levine
As a follow-up to my post yesterday concerning the New York Court of Appeals’ decision in In the Matter of Viking Pump, Inc. and Warren Pumps, LLC, Insurance Appeals, where the New York high court confirmed that policyholders may allocate all amounts of loss to a single policy and a single policy year, Syed Ahmad, a partner in our Insurance Coverage Counseling and Litigation team, was interviewed by Law360 about the decision’s broad-ranging implications. [read post]
5 May 2016, 4:45 pm by Pillsbury's Construction Law Team
Tievsky discusses New York State Court of Appeals’ decision in In re Viking Pump, Inc. [read post]
25 Nov 2009, 3:40 pm
You are trying to get health, not hurt, so pump up with something that is not going to damage your body. [read post]
27 Jul 2017, 7:13 am by Michael S. Levine
The ruling adopted the principles articulated by New York’s highest court, the Court of Appeals, in last year’s landmark Viking Pump decision. [read post]
27 Jul 2017, 7:13 am by Michael S. Levine
The ruling adopted the principles articulated by New York’s highest court, the Court of Appeals, in last year’s landmark Viking Pump decision. [read post]
Although less expensive than premium brands like Viking, Frigidaire sells appliances like its dishwashers at a considerable premium over competitive offerings. [read post]
26 Jul 2017, 9:15 am by Patrick M. McDermott
Because the district court had applied a pro rata allocation based on pre-Viking Pump case law, the Second Circuit remanded for the district court to recalculate damages. [read post]
26 Jul 2017, 9:15 am by Patrick M. McDermott
Because the district court had applied a pro rata allocation based on pre-Viking Pump case law, the Second Circuit remanded for the district court to recalculate damages. [read post]
19 Sep 2017, 11:06 am by Patrick M. McDermott
As Ahmad noted, the KeySpan appeal “shows that the Viking Pump ruling can raise many more questions than it raises. [read post]
19 Sep 2017, 11:06 am by Patrick M. McDermott
As Ahmad noted, the KeySpan appeal “shows that the Viking Pump ruling can raise many more questions than it raises. [read post]
  The court held that it was bound by Matter of Viking Pump, 33 N.Y.S.3d 118 (N.Y. 2016), because, in Hopeman, as in Viking Pump, the policies all contained “non-cumulation clauses” which require application of all sums allocation. [read post]