Search for: "VIP Products LLC" Results 21 - 40 of 106
Sorted by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
22 Nov 2022, 6:48 am by Eileen McDermott
Supreme Court yesterday granted a petition filed in August this year by Jack Daniel’s Properties, Inc. seeking clarification on whether the First Amendment protects VIP Products, LLC, a maker of dog toys that made humorous use of Jack Daniel’s trademarks for commercial purposes, against claims of infringement and dilution. [read post]
22 Nov 2022, 6:48 am by Eileen McDermott
Supreme Court yesterday granted a petition filed in August this year by Jack Daniel’s Properties, Inc. seeking clarification on whether the First Amendment protects VIP Products, LLC, a maker of dog toys that made humorous use of Jack Daniel’s trademarks for commercial purposes, against claims of infringement and dilution. [read post]
8 Jun 2022, 3:25 am
In April 2022, INTA filed an amicus brief (pdf here) supporting Jack Daniel's petition for en banc rehearing of the BAD SPANIELS decision in VIP Products LLC v. [read post]
24 Apr 2023, 10:20 am by DONALD SCARINCI
Dog Toy Dispute The dispute involves a dog toy sold by Respondent VIP Products LLC (VIP) that imitates Jack Daniel’s famous Old No. 7 Black Label Tennessee Whiskey bottle. [read post]
16 Oct 2020, 12:55 pm by Andrew Hamm
VIP Products LLC is a trademark case between the Tennessee whiskey distillery and an Arizona company that produces chew toys for dogs. [read post]
8 Jun 2023, 6:30 pm by Dennis Crouch
VIP Products LLC and unanimously vacated the Ninth Circuit favoring the accused comedic copycat. [read post]
9 Jun 2023, 3:47 pm by Gordon Firemark
VIP PRODUCTS LLC USSC Case no. 22-148 Decided June 8, 2023 Jack Daniel's has emerged victorious in its legal battle over a dog toy that parodied its iconic liquor bottle. [read post]
9 Jun 2023, 3:47 pm by Gordon Firemark
VIP PRODUCTS LLC USSC Case no. 22-148 Decided June 8, 2023 Jack Daniel's has emerged victorious in its legal battle over a dog toy that parodied its iconic liquor bottle. [read post]
20 Mar 2023, 9:10 am by Rebecca Tushnet
TokeRimon P.C.Amicus brief for INTA in support of neither partyhttps://www.wcl.american.edu/impact/initiatives-programs/pijip/events/ip-at-the-supreme-court-jack-daniels-properties-inc-v-vip-products-llc/http://tushnet.blogspot.com/feeds/posts/default? [read post]
11 Mar 2023, 9:15 am by Eileen McDermott
In November 2022, the Supreme Court granted Jack Daniel’s petition for a writ of certiorari, which seeks to clarify whether the First Amendment protects VIP Products, LLC’s humorous use of Jack Daniel’s trademarks for commercial purposes against claims of infringement and dilution. [read post]
25 Mar 2023, 9:15 am by Justin Gunnell
VIP Products LLC last week, I was reminded of an article I penned years ago for Cardozo Arts & Entertainment Law Journal exploring the boundaries of parodies when up against allegations of trademark infringement and dilution. [read post]
25 Mar 2023, 9:15 am by Justin Gunnell
VIP Products LLC last week, I was reminded of an article I penned years ago for Cardozo Arts & Entertainment Law Journal exploring the boundaries of parodies when up against allegations of trademark infringement and dilution. [read post]
11 Mar 2023, 9:15 am by Eileen McDermott
In November 2022, the Supreme Court granted Jack Daniel’s petition for a writ of certiorari, which seeks to clarify whether the First Amendment protects VIP Products, LLC’s humorous use of Jack Daniel’s trademarks for commercial purposes against claims of infringement and dilution. [read post]