Search for: "VITAL BASICS INC" Results 1 - 20 of 228
Sort by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
28 Mar 2024, 12:30 pm by Nicole Pottroff
So, let’s take it back to the basics of “similarly situated entities. [read post]
4 Mar 2024, 12:47 pm
 Pix credit here The majority’s choice of a different path leaves the remaining Justices with a choice of how to respond. [read post]
7 Feb 2024, 7:57 am by Karen Gullo
In addressing this, we must consider two potential obstacles to our vital work. [read post]
13 Dec 2023, 8:49 am by Eric Goldman
Which makes the question of copyright preemption of online contracts a vitally important one for any person or business that is looking to do anything important with online data. [read post]
29 Jul 2023, 2:23 pm by Eugene Volokh
Supreme Court has held that the First Amendment does not protect the distribution of "obscenity," a narrow category that basically covers hard-core pornography. [read post]
8 May 2023, 4:01 am by Peter Mahler
The relatively small number of reported § 1118 cases in which courts have departed from the 9% statutory rate include Giaimo v Vitale (4%), Matter of Whalen (4%), Matter of Bambu Sales, Inc. (5.75%), and Matter of Fleischer (12%) — none of which explained how the court arrived at the chosen rate. [read post]
14 Mar 2023, 4:00 am by Ian Mackenzie
Natyf wanted its television service to be granted mandatory distribution on the digital basic service in Quebec. [read post]
13 Jan 2023, 3:00 am by Jim Sedor
But they could also make it difficult for the House to carry out even its most basic duties in the next two years, such as funding the government, including the military, or avoiding a catastrophic federal debt default. [read post]
25 Nov 2022, 2:37 pm by Arianna Morseau
Michigan Indian Legal Services, Inc RFP Call for Artists. [read post]
19 Jun 2022, 5:05 pm by admin
 In 1989, the United States Court of Appeals for the Fifth Circuit resolved an appeal involving expert witnesses who relied upon epidemiologic studies by concluding that it did not have to resolve questions of bias and confounding because the studies relied upon had presented their results with confidence intervals.[4] Judges and expert witnesses persistently interpreted single confidence intervals from one study as having a 95 percent probability of containing the actual parameter.[5]… [read post]