Search for: "VOLVO CARS NORTH AMERICA" Results 1 - 20 of 31
Sort by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
31 Jan 2023, 9:02 am
According to the NHTSA, Volvo Group North America, a collective of several manufacturers of heavy-duty trucks and buses, which is a separate entity from Volvo Cars, did not recall vehicles in a timely fashion or comply with other recall and reporting requirements. [read post]
26 Mar 2018, 9:07 am by bcutterlaw
Shortly thereafter the ride-sharing company announced they would temporarily halt their self-driving vehicle testing across North America. [read post]
24 Jan 2018, 6:55 pm by robin.hall@capstonelawyers.com
Volvo Cars of North America, LLC, et al., the court relied on the notion of common sense (and basic contract formation principles) to cudgel Volvo’s and other automakers’ attempts to moot consumer class actions through the trend of “picking off” plaintiffs. [read post]
23 Oct 2017, 4:23 am by Andrew Lavoott Bluestone
“In this legal malpractice action, the plaintiff alleges that Volvo Financial North America (hereinafter Volvo) was the lessor of a vehicle that struck the plaintiff’s vehicle in the rear in April 2005. [read post]
14 Apr 2017, 11:44 am by Steven Cohen
VOLVO CARS OF NORTH AMERICA, LLC et al – United States District Court – District of New Jersey – April 3rd, 2017) is a putative class action involving the sunroofs of certain cars that were sold to customers by the defendants (Volvo). [read post]
14 Apr 2017, 11:44 am by Steven Cohen
VOLVO CARS OF NORTH AMERICA, LLC et al – United States District Court – District of New Jersey – April 3rd, 2017) is a putative class action involving the sunroofs of certain cars that were sold to customers by the defendants (Volvo). [read post]
15 Aug 2016, 11:03 am by Earl Drott
Related Blog Post Texas Court Holds that Trucker’s Employer is Possible “Responsible Third Party” in Product Liability Suit Arising from Truck Braking System – In re Volvo Group North America Texas Court Dismisses Widower’s Claims Against Driver’s Employer Based on Negligent Entrustment and Vicarious Liability – Martinez v. [read post]
15 Aug 2016, 11:03 am by Earl Drott
Related Blog Post Texas Court Holds that Trucker’s Employer is Possible “Responsible Third Party” in Product Liability Suit Arising from Truck Braking System – In re Volvo Group North America Texas Court Dismisses Widower’s Claims Against Driver’s Employer Based on Negligent Entrustment and Vicarious Liability – Martinez v. [read post]
8 Jul 2016, 8:46 am by Earl Drott
Related Blog Posts: Texas Court Holds that Trucker’s Employer is Possible “Responsible Third Party” in Product Liability Suit Arising from Truck Braking System – In re Volvo Group North America Texas Court Dismisses Widower’s Claims Against Driver’s Employer Based on Negligent Entrustment and Vicarious Liability – Martinez v. [read post]
According to a recent consumer class action lawsuit against Volvo Cars of North America LLC, the car company claimed that its new XC90 T8 could drive up to 25 miles on a full electric charge, but Xavier Laurens argues that is not actually the case. [read post]
10 Jul 2014, 8:06 pm
Volvo Cars of North America, as reported in the New York State Law Reporting Bureau, the court applied a standard of care instruction applicable to malpractice cases in a products liability action. [read post]
29 Mar 2013, 1:13 pm by WIMS
      The Alliance represents 77% of all car and light truck sales in the United States, including the BMW Group, Chrysler Group LLC, Ford Motor Company, General Motors Corporation, Jaguar Land Rover, Mazda, Mercedes-Benz USA, Mitsubishi Motors, Porsche, Toyota, Volkswagen Group of America and Volvo Cars North America. [read post]
9 Jun 2012, 12:47 pm by Dana Manner
  Manufacturer Name Number of Cars Chrysler Group LLC 117 General Motors Company 116 BMW of North America, LLC 62 Hyundai Motor America 45 Toyota Motor Sales, U.S.A., Inc. 40 Mercedes-Benz USA, Inc. 32 Ford Motor Company 22 American Honda Motor Company 15 Nissan Motor Corporation U.S.A. 10 Volkswagen/Audi Of America, Inc. 8 Volvo Cars Of North America 7 Kia Motors America,… [read post]
14 Mar 2012, 12:55 pm
This month, for example, Volvo Trucks North America has announced the recall of some of its VNL and VNM vehicle brakes, saying that the brakes have a relay valve defect that could lead to accidents. [read post]
7 Mar 2012, 7:08 pm by support
Volvo Cars of North America is issuing an auto defect recall for more than 17,000 2012 Volvo S60 and Volvo S80 sedans as well as 2012 Volvo XC60 and XC70 wagons for issues relating to the front seat electrical wiring. [read post]
21 Nov 2011, 4:59 pm by Eric Schweibenz
Porsche AG of Germany Porsche Cars North America, Inc. of Atlanta, Georgia Saab Automobile AB of Sweden Saab Cars North America, Inc. of Royal Oak, Michigan Suzuki Motor Corporation of Japan American Suzuki Motor Corporation of Brea, California Jaguar Land Rover North America, LLC of Mahwah, New Jersey Jaguar Cars Limited of the United Kingdom Land Rover of the United Kingdom Toyota Motor Corporation of Japan Toyota… [read post]
25 Oct 2011, 3:59 pm by Eric Schweibenz
Porsche AG of Germany Porsche Cars North America, Inc. of Atlanta, Georgia Saab Automobile AB of Sweden Saab Cars North America, Inc. of Royal Oak, Michigan Suzuki Motor Corporation of Japan American Suzuki Motor Corporation of Brea, California Jaguar Land Rover North America, LLC of Mahwah, New Jersey Jaguar Cars Limited of the United Kingdom Land Rover of the United Kingdom Toyota Motor Corporation of Japan Toyota… [read post]
2 Aug 2011, 11:00 am
Recently, Volvo Cars of North America, LLC, announced a recall of approximately 8, 406 of its S80 passenger vehicles from model year 2007 due to a steering defect. [read post]
19 May 2010, 12:52 am by drdiekman
Volvo Cars of North America, Inc., NY Slip Op 03779 (2d Dept. 2010) Tomorrow’s issue: Trusts and Estates. [read post]
26 Oct 2009, 6:25 am
Medico (Filewrapper) BPAI finds claim indefinite and not directed to patentable subject under Bilski: Ex parte Hemmat (GRAY On Claims) District Court N D Illinois: KSR obviousness does not require prior art from the same field: Se-Kure Controls, Inc v Diam USA, Inc (Chicago Intellectual Property Law Blog) District Court E D Texas finds plaintiff has standing; agreement transfers ownership and simultaneously a conditional purchase by transferor from transferee: Balsam Coffee Solutions Inc v Folgers… [read post]