Search for: "Van v. United States of America et al"
Results 21 - 40
of 61
Sorted by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
16 May 2011, 1:10 am
Seema Warwick Hardware, Inc., et. al. [read post]
24 May 2010, 10:49 pm
(IP finance) Withdrawing patent applications – a matter of priority (IPKat) United States US General U.S. [read post]
17 Oct 2022, 11:35 am
In August, The Trace presented a conspiracy about the amicus briefs filed in New York State Rifle & Pistol Association v. [read post]
1 Apr 2017, 11:52 am
I am happy to announce the publication of my article: "A Lex Mercatoria for Corporate Social Responsibility Codes Without the State? [read post]
11 Apr 2017, 3:01 pm
Is it an autonomous community, like a nation-state? [read post]
8 Oct 2020, 6:30 am
(579) Yet, as Fulton v. [read post]
19 Nov 2017, 5:45 am
Barnes v. [read post]
6 Apr 2023, 10:51 am
SUPREME COURT OF THE UNITED STATES 59. [read post]
17 Feb 2023, 12:34 pm
Federal Republic of Germany, et al. v. [read post]
22 Aug 2011, 4:48 am
ECORE International Inc., et al. [read post]
22 Aug 2011, 4:48 am
ECORE International Inc., et al. [read post]
23 Mar 2023, 10:47 am
For example, the United States’s general copyright duration is 70 years after the death of the author, and Mexico’s duration is 100 years after the death of the author. [read post]
22 Mar 2010, 4:28 am
– EIPR article (PatLit) United States US Patent Reform Dr. [read post]
2 Apr 2020, 7:58 am
Bell, et. al., Environmental Law Handbook (2019). [read post]
12 Sep 2011, 9:30 am
[et al.].Cambridge ; New York : Cambridge University Press, 2011.K3943 .L38 2011Lawyering SkillsEssential lawyering skills : interviewing, counseling, negotiation, and persuasive fact analysis / Stefan H. [read post]
3 Apr 2020, 12:00 am
In the United States, though, the test was prohibited by the sclerotic Food and Drug Administration. [read post]
8 Dec 2009, 1:43 pm
Supreme Court which decided the historic case about global warming (Massachusetts, et al. v. [read post]
11 Jul 2013, 6:19 pm
The Omnipresent State Sector 552 2. [read post]
29 Aug 2022, 9:05 pm
The Executive Order endorsed this approach, noting that “this order reaffirms that the United States retains the authority to challenge transactions whose previous consummation was in violation of the [antitrust laws]. [read post]
13 Feb 2023, 9:59 am
Van Ness v. [read post]
