Search for: "Vazquez Contractor"
Results 1 - 20
of 43
Sorted by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
14 May 2019, 12:25 pm
Gerardo Vazquez, a unit franchisee, sued Jan-Pro alleging he and other similarly situated unit franchisees were misclassified as independent contractors. [read post]
3 May 2019, 10:42 am
Employers should carefully check agreements with their contractors against the ABC test, including the three Prong B tests discussed in Vazquez, to ensure they are properly classifying employees. [read post]
8 May 2019, 11:54 am
On May 2, 2019, the Ninth Circuit ruled in Vazquez v. [read post]
23 Jul 2019, 10:47 am
On May 2, 2019, in Vazquez v. [read post]
18 Jan 2021, 1:16 pm
On Thursday, January 14, 2021, the California Supreme Court announced in the case of Vazquez v. [read post]
19 Jan 2021, 6:18 am
On January 14, 2021, the California Supreme Court held in Vazquez v. [read post]
2 May 2019, 10:52 am
In Vazquez v. [read post]
14 Oct 2019, 7:00 am
In another case, Vazquez v. [read post]
14 Oct 2019, 7:00 am
In another case, Vazquez v. [read post]
1 Dec 2021, 7:30 am
In January 2021, the California Supreme Court held in Vazquez v. [read post]
15 May 2019, 4:30 am
A wage and hour case before the Ninth Circuit Court of Appeals, Vazquez v. [read post]
16 May 2019, 8:49 am
A federal district court applied a standard different from the ABC test and determined the workers in Vazquez were independent contractors. [read post]
31 Jul 2019, 5:08 am
On July 22, 2019, the Ninth Circuit withdrew its recent decision in Vazquez v. [read post]
5 Feb 2021, 8:32 am
Vazquez v. [read post]
22 Sep 2021, 12:12 pm
In January 2021, the California Supreme Court answered that question in Vazquez v. [read post]
14 Jan 2021, 5:41 pm
The Court’s decision from Vazquez v. [read post]
15 Jan 2021, 1:31 pm
Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit in Vazquez v. [read post]
7 Sep 2010, 12:18 pm
Vazquez v. [read post]
21 Jan 2020, 4:07 pm
San Gabriel Transit, Inc. pending its disposition of Vazquez v. [read post]
7 May 2019, 11:56 am
On May 2, 2019, the Ninth Circuit found that Dynamex applies retroactively under California law in Vazquez v. [read post]
