Search for: "Venture Express, Inc. " Results 41 - 60 of 548
Sort by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
14 Nov 2022, 4:56 am by Franklin C. McRoberts
Originally, Bakr and his co-venturers “would alternate weeks working at the location. [read post]
21 Oct 2022, 6:30 am
Tuttle, Debevoise & Plimpton LLP, on Monday, October 17, 2022 Tags: Disclosure, Insider trading, Pay for performance, SEC, Securities Act, Securities fraud, Securities litigation ESG Reporting: Asset Managers Express Divergent View Posted by Lindsey Stewart, Morningstar, Inc., on Monday, October 17, 2022 Tags: advisory board, Board of Directors, ESG, Liability standards, regulatory requirements, Sustainability The Valuation Treadmill: How Securities Fraud Threatens the… [read post]
17 Oct 2022, 4:31 am by Peter Mahler
[b]y the express will of any partner when no definite term or particular undertaking is specified. [read post]
13 Oct 2022, 1:55 pm by Kevin LaCroix
Supreme Court’s 2021 decision in Goldman Sachs Group Inc. v. [read post]
19 Aug 2022, 4:00 am by Jim Sedor
Courts, had two days earlier imposed new rules barring all employees from expressing political views, attending political events, or engaging in political activity. [read post]
Justice Gorsuch, in a dissenting opinion joined by Justice Sotomayor, expressed strong disagreement with the majority’s interpretation of Section 315(b) as “another step down the road of ceding core judicial powers to agency officials and leaving the disposition of private rights and liberties to bureaucratic mercy” (Thryv, Inc. v. [read post]
23 Jul 2022, 5:15 am by Florian Mueller
Zuckerberg can afford--but I do care about Facebook's ability to serve companies of all sizes, especially SMBs.On Thursday, Snap Inc. [read post]
9 Jun 2022, 10:19 am by Eric Goldman
As just one example (there are a couple dozen such zingers in the opinion): “Meta cites Sheppard, Mullin for the proposition that contracts may only be invalidated as contrary to public policy where they implicate express law, which is the opposite of what that case says. [read post]