Search for: "Verisign Inc. "
Results 1 - 20
of 78
Sort by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
31 Jul 2023, 1:47 pm
VeriSign, Inc., 545 F.3d 1359, 1369 n.5 (Fed. [read post]
6 Oct 2022, 5:01 am
Freedom of expression is enshrined in almost every constitution globally. [read post]
13 May 2022, 5:01 am
In WhatsApp Inc. v. [read post]
7 Jan 2021, 1:29 pm
Verisign, Inc. v. [read post]
29 Oct 2018, 2:04 pm
In 2010, for example, Microsoft Corp. brought suit in federal court in the Eastern District of Virginia against 27 John Doe defendants registered as the owners of domain names used for botnet communications.[12] Charging that defendants utilized a global illegal network of millions of computers infected with malware — a botnet named “Waledac” — to send spam email and steal information, account credentials, and funds, the complaint asserted violations of the CFAA, the CAN-SPAM… [read post]
29 Oct 2018, 1:45 pm
WBH’s position that it was harmed by Express’s advertising wasn’t sufficient for exceptionality, even though Verisign, Inc. v. [read post]
2 May 2018, 9:55 am
France.com, Inc has brought suit in Federal Court in Virginia against the French State, Atout, and against Verisign, the authoritative domain registry of all .com addresses. [read post]
13 Sep 2017, 5:22 pm
Venue is proper under the ACPA because VeriSign, Inc., the domain name registry is located in this district. 15 U.S.C. [read post]
13 Feb 2017, 8:21 am
Verisign, Inc., v. [read post]
30 Nov 2015, 4:55 am
Verisign, Inc., v. [read post]
14 Apr 2015, 9:58 pm
VeriSign, Inc., 545 F.3d 1359, 1370 (Fed. [read post]
14 Apr 2015, 9:50 am
Flipboard, Inc. [read post]
28 May 2014, 12:09 pm
Neumont asks the Court to extend the reach of the injunction to the website’s “sponsors, associates, and affiliates” and also to Neustar, Inc., and VeriSign, Inc. [read post]
14 Jan 2014, 1:59 pm
The decision could have some interesting ramifications, mainly that domain names registered with registrars based in Virginia (Verisign) are not subject to collection efforts. [read post]
21 Oct 2013, 5:17 pm
VeriSign, Inc.,545 F.3d 1359, 1371 (Fed. [read post]
11 Feb 2013, 8:49 pm
Verisign, Inc.,545 F.3d 1359, 1371 (Fed. [read post]
11 Jan 2013, 11:31 am
For whatever reason, this one was issued to “wp.browser.ovi.com”, but you can see that it chains up to a trusted Verisign root by way of intermediate Verisign certificates: Issuer: C=US, O=VeriSign, Inc., OU=VeriSign Trust Network, OU=Terms of use at https://www.verisign.com/rpa (c)10, CN=VeriSign Class 3 Secure Server CA – G3 Validity Not Before: Jun 20 00:00:00 2012 GMT Not After : Jun 21… [read post]
20 Aug 2012, 7:32 am
VeriSign, Inc., which the Ninth Circuit found to be a sufficient market for purposes of the Sherman Act. [read post]
18 Jul 2012, 9:14 pm
United Airlines Inc. v. [read post]
2 Jul 2012, 9:48 pm
ICANN is not the domain name registrar (in this case, Melbourne IT, LTD d/b/a Internet Names Worldwide) nor the registry (in this case, VeriSign, Inc.). [read post]
