Search for: "Verizon California Inc." Results 41 - 60 of 151
Sorted by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
24 Jun 2009, 8:55 am
District Court for the Central District of California by the companies behind the GIRLS GONE WILD brand (Mantra Films, Inc. and GGW Marketing, LLC) against several wireless carriers (including AT&T and Verizon) and mobile phone content providers for using the mark GIRLS GONE MOBILE to promote "adult themed entertainment products" such as downloadable videos, photos, and wallpaper of "youthful women. [read post]
2 Apr 2014, 12:52 pm by Seyfarth Shaw LLP
The Background: The DFEH’s new authority came on the heels of two game changing decisions – Wal-Mart Stores, Inc. v. [read post]
Verizon Communications, Inc., 627 F.3d 395 (9th Cir. 2010) for the proposition that the amount in controversy was simply an estimate of the total amount in dispute, not a prospective assessment of defendant’s liability. [read post]
3 May 2023, 7:50 am by David
Verizon Commc’ns, Inc., No. 2:09-cv-257, 2011 WL 13134426, at *3 (E.D. [read post]
12 Mar 2012, 10:00 pm by Stephanie Figueroa
  The companies are involved in an infringement action in the Central District of California regarding ‘281 patent. [read post]
12 Mar 2012, 10:00 pm by Stephanie Figueroa
  The companies are involved in an infringement action in the Central District of California regarding ‘281 patent. [read post]
22 Jan 2008, 7:04 am
(now Avis Budget Group, Inc.) and Time Warner, Inc. [read post]
23 Mar 2010, 6:00 am by Maxwell Kennerly
Among those submitting amicus briefs to the Federal Circuit were: The University of California Federal Circuit Bar Association Monsanto Company GlaxoSmithKline Microsoft Corporation Google Inc. [read post]