Search for: "Village of Chestnut Ridge"
Results 1 - 20
of 27
Sorted by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
1 May 2023, 3:48 pm
Matter of Kogut v Village of Chestnut Ridge, 2023 NY Slip Op 01283 (2d Dept. 3/15/23) Matter of Kogut v Village of Chestnut Ridge, 2023 NY Slip Op 01297 (2d Dept. 3/15/23) * This case is related to a previous LOTL post – https://lawoftheland.wordpress.com/2022/10/01/fed-dist-court-of-ny-dismisses-establishment-clause-claims-over-enactment-of-zoning-law-related-to-houses-of-worship-for-lack-of-standing/ [read post]
16 Aug 2021, 4:00 am
In Orthodox Jewish Coalition of Chestnut Ridge v. [read post]
2 Apr 2021, 4:10 am
In Orthodox Jewish Coalition of Chestnut Ridge v. [read post]
29 Mar 2015, 7:27 am
As recounted by the court:Plaintiffs are religious corporations and individuals affiliated with the Chofetz Chaim sect of Orthodox Judaism, and they allege an interest in the operation of Kiryas Radin, a religious educational institution and center for religious activity and prayer, located on 4.7 acres of unincorporated land in the Town of Ramapo....The heart of Plaintiffs’ case is their allegation that Defendants [village officials] colluded to file the Chestnut… [read post]
4 Oct 2008, 8:45 pm
In Village of Chestnut Ridge v. [read post]
4 Oct 2022, 4:05 am
Village of Chestnut Ridge, New York, (SD NY, Sept. 30, 2022), a New York federal district court dismissed for lack of standing a suit by a civic organization and Village residents alleging that the Village's new zoning code violated the Establishment Clause by favoring one religious group, Orthodox Jews. [read post]
1 Oct 2022, 8:02 pm
Citizens United to Protect our Neighborhoods v Village of Chestnut Ridge, 2022 WL 4647821 (SDNY 9/30/2022) [read post]
2nd Circuit: Plaintiffs Lack Standing to Challenge Zoning Law That Accommodates Jewish Worship Sites
8 Apr 2024, 4:05 am
Village of Chestnut Ridge, New York, (2d Cir., April 5, 2024), the U.S. 2nd Circuit Court of Appeals held that neither the organizational nor the individual plaintiffs had standing to bring an Establishment Clause challenge to the Village's 2019 zoning law applicable to places of worship. [read post]
19 Aug 2007, 8:54 am
In a comprehensive review of the capacity and standing of one municipality to sue another over local zoning, the Appellate Division, Second Department, in Matter of Village of Chestnut Ridge v. [read post]
19 Aug 2007, 8:54 am
In a comprehensive review of the capacity and standing of one municipality to sue another over local zoning, the Appellate Division, Second Department, in Matter of Village of Chestnut Ridge v. [read post]
2 Apr 2010, 4:10 am
This suit grows out of an alleged attempt by several nearby villages to block a proposed revision in Ramapo's zoning law that was designed to accommodate the need of the Orthodox and Hasidic community.In 2004, four villages and two Ramapo residents filed a lawsuit (the Chestnut Ridge action) challenging on environmental grounds Ramapo's zoning changes. [read post]
16 Jul 2009, 9:09 am
David Merzif, representing the village cited a similar case involving a bridge in Chestnut Ridge which concluded that a bridge is a span that goes over a stream and the town is responsible for it unless the village voluntarily takes responsibility. [read post]
1 May 2015, 7:46 am
The court’s 76-page decision begins with a recitation of the long procedural history of the case and the separate 2004 action filed by four Villages within the Town of Ramapo: the Village of Wesley Hills, the Village of Chestnut Ridge, the Village of Montebello, and the Village of Pomona (the “Chestnut Ridge Action”). [read post]
26 Sep 2015, 10:22 pm
At this stage of the litigation, the court also held that under the due process clause and FHA, Sullivan Farms had adequately alleged that it suffered has been deprived of a property interest via the diminution in the value of its investment in Chestnut Ridge that has been caused by the financial injury due to the delays in closing sales on the completed townhomes. [read post]
15 Apr 2024, 6:42 am
Village of Chestnut Ridge, New York, issued on April 5, eleven months after oral argument. [read post]
26 Aug 2012, 6:14 am
Hempstead, 69 NY2d 406, 409-410, 413-414; Matter of Village of Chestnut Ridge v Town of Ramapo, 45 AD3d 74, 89-90; Matter of Ontario Hgts. [read post]
26 Aug 2012, 6:14 am
Hempstead, 69 NY2d 406, 409-410, 413-414; Matter of Village of Chestnut Ridge v Town of Ramapo, 45 AD3d 74, 89-90; Matter of Ontario Hgts. [read post]
14 Jul 2020, 8:00 am
Carrington Place of Chestnut Hill LLC, No. 19-11884 (Pa. [read post]
12 Apr 2018, 1:17 pm
A lead agency ‘need not investigate every conceivable environmental problem’ during the course of SEQRA review (Matter of Save the Pine Bush, Inc. v Common Council of City of Albany, 13 NY3d 297, 307 [2009]), and ‘generalized community objections or speculative environmental consequences’ are not sufficient to establish a SEQRA violation (Matter of Village of Chestnut Ridge v Town of Ramapo, 99 AD3d 918, 925-926 [2012] [internal citations… [read post]
12 Apr 2018, 1:17 pm
A lead agency ‘need not investigate every conceivable environmental problem’ during the course of SEQRA review (Matter of Save the Pine Bush, Inc. v Common Council of City of Albany, 13 NY3d 297, 307 [2009]), and ‘generalized community objections or speculative environmental consequences’ are not sufficient to establish a SEQRA violation (Matter of Village of Chestnut Ridge v Town of Ramapo, 99 AD3d 918, 925-926 [2012] [internal citations… [read post]
