Search for: "Virginia J. Arnold" Results 1 - 20 of 71
Sort by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
8 Apr 2024, 10:08 am by admin
The limits of peer review ultimately make it a poor proxy for the validity tests posed by Rules 702 and 703. [read post]
8 Feb 2024, 9:36 am by Eugene Volokh
"[8] Again, "a mob of soldiery organized from the States of Maryland and Virginia, and States south of Virginia, would have defeated the inauguration of the Chief Magistrate" if not for Scott's preparations.[9] The insurrectionists of 2021 succeeded where their predecessors had failed. [read post]
3 Oct 2022, 12:04 pm by admin
In “Cheng’s Proposed Consensus Rule for Expert Witnesses,”[1] I discussed a recent law review article by Professor Edward K. [read post]
4 Sep 2022, 4:15 pm by INFORRM
On 11 August 2022, the Court of Appeal (Arnold LJ, Dingemans LJ and Warby LJ) gave judgment in Riley v Murray [2022] EWCA Civ 1146. [read post]
25 Jul 2022, 1:54 am by INFORRM
On 21 July 2022 the Court of Appeal (Arnold, Dingemans and Warby LJJ) heard the defendant’s appeal in the case of Riley v Murray against the judgment of Nicklin J dated 20 December 2021 ([2021] EWHC 3437 (QB)) in which damages of £10,000 were awarded to the claimant. [read post]
7 Feb 2019, 9:30 pm by Bobby Chen
IN THE NEWS In his State of the Union address, President Donald J. [read post]
23 Apr 2018, 8:28 am by Dan Carvajal
Key Findings Property tax limitations have been adopted in forty-six states and the District of Columbia, though their designs and restrictiveness differ widely. [read post]
22 Apr 2018, 4:31 pm by INFORRM
On 19 April 2018 Arnold J handed down a judgment on costs in the case of Ali v Channel 5 [2018] EWHC 840 (Ch). [read post]
25 Feb 2018, 4:49 pm by INFORRM
On 22 February 2018 Arnold J handed down judgment in the case of Ali v Channel 5 Broadcast ([2018] EWHC 298 (Ch)) finding that the claimants’ privacy had been invaded. [read post]
29 Dec 2017, 7:34 am by Ben
In the UK in FAPL v BT [2017] Mr Justice Arnold concluded that the High Court has the jurisdiction to make an order against an access provider that would require the ISP to block access not to a website but rather streaming servers giving unauthorised access to copyright content - 'live' blocking. [read post]
8 Oct 2017, 4:11 pm by INFORRM
 29 and 30 June 2017 (Rafferty LJ and Popplewell J). [read post]