Search for: "WELLS v. NAPOLITANO" Results 41 - 60 of 84
Sorted by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
28 Jun 2019, 6:07 am by Chris Hajec
Hajec is Director of Litigation at the Immigration Reform Law Institute, which filed an amicus brief in support of the administration in Department of Commerce v. [read post]
5 Aug 2016, 5:40 am by SHG
While this burden is high, facial constitutional challenges are permissible “in the presence of a constitutionally protected right” (Dickerson v Napolitano, 604 F3d 732, 744 [2d Cir 2010)[discussing City of Chicago v Morales, 527 US 41 [1999)). [read post]
13 Jul 2013, 8:00 am by Raffaela Wakeman
Seriously, I can’t believe Wells, Ritika and I aren’t portrayed by two enormous bubbles. [read post]
23 May 2011, 5:00 am by Kevin
From a complaint filed last week in San Francisco:  Michael M ____ v. [read post]
13 Apr 2010, 11:16 am
He wrote so many majority opinions in his 34 years as well as some very powerful dissents. [read post]
1 Oct 2012, 10:42 am by Marie-Andree Weiss
Three Recent Cases The law is alive and well enforced. [read post]
16 May 2017, 6:28 pm by Bernie Burk
  As Steve pointed out, Napolitano’s own website (JudgeNap.com) and bio are stuffed with references to his former job, Fox News refers to him as a “senior judicial analyst,” and Napolitano reportedly insisted that Fox make his television set resemble a judge’s chambers. [read post]
12 Apr 2010, 9:50 am
In his letter, Stevens pointedly indicated he was announcing it now so his successor could be confirmed "well in advance" of the beginning of the Court's fall term in October. [read post]
5 Sep 2013, 6:57 am by Lorene Park
In fact, just yesterday I read a case where a TSA employee who reported sexual harassment (including two assaults on airport property) was allegedly coerced into signing a pre-written statement indicating the relationship was consensual (Marugame v Napolitano). [read post]
8 Apr 2015, 4:01 pm by Stephen Bilkis
Napolitano, 604 F.3d 732, 744 (2d Cir.2010) (discussing City of Chicago v. [read post]
29 Oct 2013, 9:16 pm by Walter Olson
The Supreme Court has noticed the issue as well: At the Supreme Court, SYG dates back to the 1895 case of Beard v. [read post]
22 Feb 2012, 7:48 am by Raffaela Wakeman
Read Jack’s review here, and Wells’ here. [read post]
22 Nov 2014, 1:51 pm
Citing the Supreme Court’s 1985 precedent of Heckler v. [read post]
12 Dec 2008, 2:13 pm
Napolitano (9th Cir., 2000) 247 F.3d 903, 1011). [read post]
11 Feb 2016, 10:19 am by John Eastman
” That was well before the 2012 elections, of course. [read post]