Search for: "WELLS v. WAL-MART STORES EAST, LP" Results 1 - 14 of 14
Sorted by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
17 Feb 2010, 7:16 pm
Wal-Mart Stores East, LP (3D08-3219), the Third District reversed the entry of a temporary injunction. [read post]
14 Jun 2012, 8:20 am by Ron Miller
In Osterhout v Wal-Mart Stores East, LP, the giant retailer was denied its motion to dismiss an employee’s age, gender and disability discrimination and FMLA interference and retaliation claims based on the doctrine of judicial estoppel despite her failure to disclose those claims in bankruptcy proceedings. [read post]
20 Mar 2013, 4:20 am by Lorene Park
For example, in Muhammad v Wal-Mart Stores East, LP, a federal court sua sponte sanctioned an employee’s attorney who tried to avoid summary judgment by “disingenuously” arguing that an unpleaded gender bias claim had merit and could be pursued simply because the employee checked the Title VII box on his form complaint (WDNY 2012). [read post]
11 Jul 2013, 6:20 pm by Joy Waltemath
The Southern District of Alabama found  (Denham v Wal-Mart Stores East, LP, March 26, 2013) that any employee’s use of the n-word was “patently offensive,” but an “isolated utterance on a single occasion,” not directed at anyone in the workplace, was a stray remark that failed to meet the legal threshold for a cognizable Title VII claim. [read post]
25 Oct 2013, 3:56 am by Lorene Park
The ADA does not require an employer to place an employee on permanent light duty or give other workers an employee’s assignments to accommodate a physical impairment (Josey v Wal-Mart Stores East, LP). [read post]
26 May 2011, 10:54 am by Bexis
Wal-Mart Stores East, LP, 2010 WL 419393, at *2-4 (M.D. [read post]