Search for: "Wal-Mart Corp" Results 161 - 180 of 821
Sorted by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
7 Mar 2011, 12:30 am by Greg Mersol
Wal-Mart Stores, Inc., 603 F.3d 571 (9th Cir.), cert. granted, 131 S.Ct. 795 (2010), now pending before the United States Supreme Court, discrimination cases still are being brought and may, under the proper circumstances, be certified. [read post]
29 Mar 2013, 9:27 am by Epstein Becker & Green, P.C.
 The bell-weather case in that regard is Wal-Mart Stores, Inc. v. [read post]
28 Apr 2016, 12:05 pm by Sean Wajert
Wal-Mart Stores, Inc., No. 15-69, 2016 WL 1453912 (E.D. [read post]
28 Apr 2016, 12:05 pm by Sean Wajert
Wal-Mart Stores, Inc., No. 15-69, 2016 WL 1453912 (E.D. [read post]
28 Apr 2016, 12:05 pm by Sean Wajert
Wal-Mart Stores, Inc., No. 15-69, 2016 WL 1453912 (E.D. [read post]
29 Nov 2010, 7:07 am by Lyle Denniston
The six women who filed the case against Wal-Mart, contending that its store managers routinely engage in rampant discrimination against their female workers, represent a nationwide class that is seeking what Wal-Mart estimates to be billions of dollars in damages. [read post]
1 Nov 2013, 1:45 am by Jon Gelman
[Click here to see the rest of this post] Found on Related articles Leaked documents reveal the secret finances of a pro-industry science group (workers-compensation.blogspot.com) The Impact and Echoes of the Wal-Mart Discrimination Case (workers-compensation.blogspot.com) Think asbestos is banned in the US? [read post]
23 Apr 2014, 5:59 am
Wal-Mart Stores, Inc., 233 F.3d 880 (5th Cir. 2000); Spivey v. [read post]
4 Jun 2014, 4:00 am by Administrator
Wal-Mart Canada Corp., 2014 ONCA 419 [49] Pinnock submits that no jury acting reasonably could have found him liable for this tort. [read post]
3 Apr 2008, 3:57 am
’s iTunes, which has emerged as the second-largest music retailer in the U.S. after Wal-Mart Stores Inc. [read post]
28 Mar 2013, 4:09 am by Heidi Henson
The majority found that the Third Circuit ran afoul of Supreme Court precedents, including Wal-Mart Stores, Inc v Dukes, when it refused to entertain arguments against the named plaintiffs’ damages model that bore on the propriety of class certification simply because they would also be pertinent to the merits determination. [read post]