Search for: "Wal-Mart Inc. Stores" Results 21 - 40 of 1,997
Sort by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
23 May 2023, 5:52 pm by Bill Marler
The law firm has brought Salmonella lawsuits against such companies as Cargill, ConAgra, Peanut Corporation of America, Sheetz, Taco Bell, Subway and Wal-Mart. [read post]
., 369 NLRB No. 5 (2020) (distinguishing earlier Board Cases and finding the offer of significantly more backpay than is owed in return for a waiver of reinstatement lawful); Cases involving the applicability of United Nurses & Allied Professionals (Kent Hospital), 367 NLRB No. 94 (2019) (requiring that unions provide non-member objectors with verification that the financial information disclosed to them has been independently audited and that lobbying costs are not chargeable to such… [read post]
3 May 2023, 7:50 am by David
Wal-Mart Stores, Inc., 575 F.3d 1312, 1330 (Fed. [read post]
29 Mar 2023, 5:01 am by Eugene Volokh
If you just blithely ignore it, and publish the story despite having been told that it may well be mistaken, that would be textbook "reckless disregard," which would allow liability even in a public official case: Consider, for instance, Harte-Hanks Communications, Inc. v. [read post]
23 Mar 2023, 12:46 pm by Joshua Fox and David Gobel
Cases involving the applicability of Wal-Mart Stores, 368 NLRB No. 24 (2019) (broadly defining an intermittent strike). [read post]
23 Mar 2023, 12:46 pm by Joshua Fox and David Gobel
Cases involving the applicability of Wal-Mart Stores, 368 NLRB No. 24 (2019) (broadly defining an intermittent strike). [read post]
23 Mar 2023, 12:46 pm by Joshua Fox and David Gobel
Cases involving the applicability of Wal-Mart Stores, 368 NLRB No. 24 (2019) (broadly defining an intermittent strike). [read post]
10 Nov 2022, 5:00 am
Wal-Mart, Inc., No. 2:2022-CV-1217 (E.D. [read post]
30 Oct 2022, 10:01 am by jonathanturley
Here is my annual list of Halloween torts and crimes. [read post]
26 Oct 2022, 6:22 am by Second Circuit Civil Rights Blog
OSHA fined Wal-Mart $10,864, claiming the store violated the Secured Storage Standard under the federal regulations, which require big-box stores to store materials in a way that does not create a hazard. [read post]
Notably, the Board overruled its prior 2019 holding in Wal-Mart Stores, Inc., where it found the “special circumstances” test applies only when an employer completely prohibits union insignia as opposed to imposing less restrictions, such as limiting the size and appearance of such insignia. [read post]
Notably, the Board overruled its prior 2019 holding in Wal-Mart Stores, Inc., where it found the “special circumstances” test applies only when an employer completely prohibits union insignia as opposed to imposing less restrictions, such as limiting the size and appearance of such insignia. [read post]