Search for: "Wallace v. State Of California"
Results 21 - 40
of 191
Sorted by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
15 Jan 2013, 7:33 am
U.S. v. [read post]
21 Mar 2011, 3:57 pm
You see UCLA is a public college, meaning that it not only receives a large chunk of its funding from the state of California, but under National Collegiate Athletic Association v. [read post]
5 Jun 2010, 3:30 am
United States v. $33,020.00 in United States Currency, 2010 U.S. [read post]
19 Dec 2019, 7:56 am
Chamber of Commerce of the United States v. [read post]
31 May 2016, 12:28 pm
Under a 2013 Supreme Court decision, Harris v. [read post]
17 Jul 2018, 2:50 pm
Fyock v. [read post]
12 Feb 2007, 11:05 pm
Wallace v. [read post]
28 May 2019, 8:09 am
Just how remarkable it was becomes apparent when it is contrasted with a decision of the United States Supreme Court just a year later, Adderly v. [read post]
28 May 2019, 8:09 am
Just how remarkable it was becomes apparent when it is contrasted with a decision of the United States Supreme Court just a year later, Adderly v. [read post]
20 Apr 2012, 8:36 am
Sisto, No. 08-17324 (4-18-12) (Bea with O'Scannlain and Graber).The petitioner filed a number of post-conviction challenges to his state (California) second degree murder conviction. [read post]
29 Jul 2007, 8:30 am
" Wallace v. [read post]
11 Jun 2012, 9:24 am
The state petitioner raised Blakely issues before the California Supreme Court. [read post]
28 Feb 2009, 9:27 am
§ 7701(a); see MySpace, Inc. v. [read post]
16 Jan 2020, 11:34 am
Appeal docketed No. 19-35281, May 3, 2019); Wallace v. [read post]
18 Nov 2018, 2:08 pm
United States, 2018 U.S. [read post]
20 May 2014, 11:37 am
The question is whether it's unconstitutional for the state to make public donors to that Proposition. [read post]
17 Dec 2007, 3:21 am
Wallace dissented, arguing that the state's application of harmlessness was reasonable.U.S. v. [read post]
23 Apr 2012, 9:43 am
Noble v. [read post]
26 Apr 2019, 9:45 am
On appeal, defendant argued that California state law only requires a signal if it affected movement of another vehicle. [read post]