Search for: "Ward v. Social Security Administration" Results 1 - 20 of 49
Sorted by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
27 Sep 2013, 7:25 am by Joy Waltemath
A state-run psychiatric hospital’s staffing directive, which restricted darker-skinned employees from working with a violent, racist patient, was not discriminatory, a federal district court in Washington ruled, in granting summary judgment to the employer (Blackburn v State of Washington Department of Social and Health Services, September 25, 2013, Leighton, R). [read post]
Finally, armed with valid work authorization, DACA recipients can obtain a valid social security number, as well as a number of other government benefits and opportunities, including driver’s licenses. [read post]
26 Jun 2013, 2:00 pm by Joanna L. Grossman
This provision has created chaos: Couples who were legally married in their home states were nevertheless treated as single by the federal government for purposes ranging from immigration, to taxes, to Social Security Accordingly, Section Three has been repeatedly challenged in court. [read post]
20 Jan 2015, 3:41 am by Janet Kentridge, Matrix
(See paragraph 28, referring to Royal College of Nursing of the United Kingdom v Department of Health and Social Security [1981] AC 800 (HL)). [read post]
29 Mar 2010, 1:18 pm by Witzke Berry PLLC
The second reason to have a will is to make the administration of your estate run smoothly. [read post]
18 Nov 2014, 9:51 am
Appellant had not exhausted all administrative remedies, so the district court dismissed his complaint. [read post]
14 Oct 2018, 4:20 pm by INFORRM
On 18 October 2018 there will be an application in the case of Ward v McGovern. [read post]
9 Jan 2019, 4:16 am by Edith Roberts
Berryhill, that a 25 percent cap in the Social Security Act on the award of attorney’s fees applies only to fees for representing a client in court, and not to aggregate fees for both court representation and representation before the agency. [read post]
30 Sep 2010, 6:23 pm by Robert McKennon
“Instead,” DeBofsky said, “courts conduct reviews of claim records assembled and shaped by self-serving insurance companies without hearing any testimony whatsoever, under a procedure that gives more deference to the insurance company than a court would give a Social Security administrative law judge in its review of a Social Security disability benefit claim denial. [read post]
10 Apr 2022, 4:56 pm by INFORRM
IPSO 01743-21 Power v Mail Online, 1 Accuracy (2019), No breach – after investigation 08762-21 Nita v edinburghnews .scotsman.com, 14 Confidential sources (2019), 2 Privacy (2019), 1 Accuracy (2019), No breach – after investigation 10375-21 Warde v Bridport & Lyme Regis News, 12 Discrimination (2021), 1 Accuracy (2021), No breach – after investigation 00505-22 Various v mirror.co.uk, 1 Accuracy (2021), Breach – sanction: action… [read post]
11 Oct 2020, 4:31 pm by INFORRM
Japan The Japan Times had a piece “Courts struggling to define what constitutes defamation in social media”. [read post]
26 Apr 2023, 6:30 am by Guest Blogger
The thundering demand to guard personal privacy and ensure security of personal data echoes in responses of Republicans and Democrats who share desires to halt the sharing of disinformation by social media platform companies and reverse the jeopardy to democracy. [read post]