Search for: "Warner Bros. Records Inc."
Results 41 - 60
of 115
Sort by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
6 Apr 2014, 5:30 am
Sodrac 2003 Inc., 2014 FCA 84 -> How to return computers after Anton Pillar seizure 9219-1568 Quebec Inc. v. [read post]
19 Jan 2014, 2:16 pm
Robert Welch, Inc., the Supreme Court held that even a private figure must prove, at least, that a false fact was uttered negligently to prevail on a defamation claim. [read post]
12 Dec 2013, 2:55 pm
UMG Recordings, et. al. v. [read post]
13 Nov 2013, 12:16 pm
Warner Bros. [read post]
11 Nov 2013, 9:23 pm
Jews for Jesus, Inc., 482 U.S. 569 (1987) (stating that an airport’s proposed interpretation of a speech-restricting policy would be unconstitutionally vague, even if an airport were to be treated as a nonpublic forum); International Soc. for Krishna Consciousness, Inc. v. [read post]
13 Oct 2013, 5:30 am
Dworkin http://t.co/LhLyNNZgfi -> Ban on most robocalls and text message spam gets stronger this month http://t.co/LhvxsEPe2M -> Patent goliath Intellectual Ventures looks to raise another $3 billion http://t.co/5Cf6lyK2NC -> European organizations file lawsuit against UK over vast digital surveillance http://t.co/6KHQw55qbJ -> Composing Consent: Federal Court Dismisses Pinto v BJEC http://t.co/wGf61eBGve -> Computer and Internet Law Weekly Updates for 2013-10-05: Computer and… [read post]
18 Jun 2013, 4:56 pm
Warner Bros. [read post]
7 Jun 2013, 9:36 am
Let me know via Twitter @plagiarismtoday. 1: Warner Bros: We’re Fining File-Sharers Who Use Non Six-Strike ISPs First off today, Andy at Torrentfreak writes that Warner Brothers has been sending notices to suspected file sharers who are not on ISPs involved in the “Six Strikes” system and, in those notices, is demanding a small payment for suspected infringements. [read post]
10 Apr 2013, 11:38 am
In March of 2012, two lawsuits sought to stop Aereo, Inc. from doing what it was then going to start doing on March 14. [read post]
19 Mar 2013, 5:19 am
Among others, there’s the Betty Boop case (victory for AVELA) and the Wizard of Oz/Gone With the Wind case, Warner Bros. [read post]
12 Sep 2012, 2:54 pm
The record labels include Capitol Records Inc., Sony BMG Music Entertainment, Arista Records LLC, Interscope Records, Warner Bros. [read post]
12 Sep 2012, 7:41 am
The companies involved in the litigation include Capitol Records, Inc., Sony BMG Music Entertainment, Arista Records LLC, InterscopeRecords, Warner Bros. [read post]
5 Jul 2012, 1:45 am
The recording artist’s side claims it’s not, and that they approached the company about finding a way to co-exist. [read post]
14 Jun 2012, 6:59 am
A former Warner Bros. executive, Mark DeVitre, will join Entertainment Studios as executive vice president and general counsel. [read post]
21 Feb 2012, 8:38 am
The copyright in the original work is in the public domain, but Warner Bros. is vying against Disney for the rights to federally register several OZ related marks. [read post]
1 Feb 2012, 1:00 pm
Not a “Useful Article” Last year, DC Comics, a subsidiary of Warner Bros., sued Mark Towles, who operated a business called “Gotham Garage,” which sold imitation batmobiles. [read post]
3 Jan 2012, 1:05 pm
* Ars Technica: Warner Bros: we issued takedowns for files we never saw, didn't own copyright to * Megaupload brought a 512(f) suit against UMG for wrongfully taking down a promotional video. [read post]
28 Dec 2011, 5:29 pm
Metro-Goldwyn Mayer, Inc.2 Bartsch involved an agreement entered into in 1930, in which plaintiff’s predecessor in interest granted Warner Bros. [read post]
28 Dec 2011, 5:29 pm
Metro-Goldwyn Mayer, Inc.2 Bartsch involved an agreement entered into in 1930, in which plaintiff’s predecessor in interest granted Warner Bros. [read post]
28 Dec 2011, 5:29 pm
Metro-Goldwyn Mayer, Inc.2 Bartsch involved an agreement entered into in 1930, in which plaintiff’s predecessor in interest granted Warner Bros. [read post]
