Search for: "Warner Brothers Records, Inc."
Results 21 - 40
of 51
Sorted by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
9 Nov 2023, 2:56 pm
In 1938, the Department of Justice (DOJ) sued the major studios at the time, also known as the Big Five (MGM, Paramount, RKO, 20th Century Fox, and Warner Brothers) and the Little Three (Universal, United Artists, and Columbia). [read post]
18 Jan 2008, 3:01 am
Warner Books et alfiled 04/13/07 closed 05/25/071:07-cv-02089Child Support Savings Corp. v. [read post]
10 Sep 2010, 8:07 am
Black Brothers Co., 391 A.2d 1020 (Pa. 1978). [read post]
27 Oct 2009, 1:19 am
After Midway -- maker of games including Mortal Kombat -- filed for bankruptcy last February, its assets were sold to Warner Brothers, but not before the company's former shareholders sued its former executives for securities fraud. [read post]
23 Sep 2011, 3:17 am
Palm Inc. [read post]
5 Jul 2012, 1:45 am
The recording artist’s side claims it’s not, and that they approached the company about finding a way to co-exist. [read post]
13 Feb 2009, 7:00 am
– CTIA’s opposition to DMCA exemptions proposed by EFF and Wireless Alliance (EFF) US Copyright – Decisions Court of Appeals 2nd Circuit upholds ruling finding editor of 2600 magazine violated anti-trafficking provision of the DMCA by linking to DeCSS hosting sites (Media Wonk) US Copyright – Lawsuits and strategic steps Amazon – Authors’ Guild asserts Amazon’s Kindle device that reads book you have purchased… [read post]
28 Dec 2011, 5:29 pm
Metro-Goldwyn Mayer, Inc.2 Bartsch involved an agreement entered into in 1930, in which plaintiff’s predecessor in interest granted Warner Bros. [read post]
28 Dec 2011, 5:29 pm
Metro-Goldwyn Mayer, Inc.2 Bartsch involved an agreement entered into in 1930, in which plaintiff’s predecessor in interest granted Warner Bros. [read post]
28 Dec 2011, 5:29 pm
Metro-Goldwyn Mayer, Inc.2 Bartsch involved an agreement entered into in 1930, in which plaintiff’s predecessor in interest granted Warner Bros. [read post]
2 Mar 2011, 3:03 pm
Warner, Warner Brothers, 1927. [read post]
19 Dec 2012, 6:29 pm
Warner Brothers, New Line, and its affiliates (“Plaintiffs”) recently achieved a rare courtroom victory by obtaining a court order restraining distribution of a film they claimed unfairly competed with one of its titles. [read post]
5 Dec 2011, 4:00 am
Edison, Inc., said: While no definite campaign has been undertaken, the company has in a few instances aided its artists to get on the air through radio. [read post]
11 Aug 2014, 4:59 pm
Warner Brothers, 177 Cal.App.4th 427 (2009), the court held that an employer was liable for an accident which occurred while an executive was returning home from an out of town, three-day business conference. [read post]
25 Aug 2008, 10:27 am
Since he's appearing on this blog, you can guess what happened next: the production company, Warner Brothers, was sued. [read post]
13 Oct 2010, 4:20 pm
It is purely to set the record straight, and is intended only for those that are interested. [read post]
17 Sep 2009, 4:30 am
Nor was there any duty for a manufacturer to act as "big brother" to prescribing physicians:[T]his practice does not occur in every operating room. . . . [read post]
11 Aug 2014, 4:59 pm
In Halliburton Energy Services, Inc. v. [read post]
7 May 2020, 11:12 am
Mar. 25, 2013). [4] Id. [5] Warner Brothers Pictures Inc., 197 Cal.App.2d 331. [6] See, e.g., Jegen v. [read post]
2 Jun 2010, 4:12 am
It is purely to set the record straight, and is intended only for those that are interested. [read post]
