Search for: "Warner-Lambert Company, LLC." Results 81 - 97 of 97
Sort by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
2 Aug 2011, 2:45 am by sally
Court of Appeal (Civil Division) Costello & Anor v MacDonald & Ors [2011] EWCA Civ 930 (29 July 2011) High Court (Chancery Division) Warner-Lambert Company LLC v Teva UK Ltd & Ors [2011] EWHC 2018 (Ch) (22 July 2011) Payless Cash & Carry Ltd v Patel & Ors [2011] EWHC 2112 (Ch) (29 July 2011) Source: www.bailii.org [read post]
16 May 2011, 4:30 am
Warner-Lambert, Co., 265 F.3d 853 (9th Cir. 2001), noted that in diversity cases, the complaint must affirmatively allege the state of citizenship of each party. [read post]
1 Feb 2011, 4:01 am by Maxwell Kennerly
When the direct purchasers, who are really wholesale dealers several steps removed from patients, come in, though, it's a different story entirely, like in the Neurotin decision last week from the District Court for New Jersey: Plaintiffs in the instant action each directly purchased Neurontin, a brand-name version of the drug compound gabapentin anhydrous ('gabapentin'), from Defendants Pfizer, Inc. and Warner-Lambert Company, LLC… [read post]
17 Feb 2010, 8:00 am by Karen E. Keller
Pfizer Inc., Pfizer Pharmaceuticals LLC, Pfizer Ireland Pharmaceuticals, Pfizer Limited and CP Pharmaceuticals International CV, Warner-Lambert Company and Warner-Lambert Company LLC (patent infringement) [read post]
18 Dec 2009, 9:59 am by Karen E. Keller
(patent infringement) 12/3: Pfizer Inc., Pfizer Ireland Pharmaceuticals, Warner-Lambert Company and Warner-Lambert Company LLC v. [read post]
1 Dec 2009, 9:45 am by Karen E. Keller
(patent infringement) 11/23: Pfizer, Inc., Pfizer Ireland Pharmaceuticals, Warner-Lambert Company and Warner-Lambert Company, LLC v. [read post]
9 Nov 2009, 6:01 am
In the agreement the lawyers eventually hammered out, the Pfizer unit, Warner-Lambert, pleaded guilty to two felony counts of marketing a drug for unapproved uses. [read post]
15 May 2009, 1:03 am
Pfizer Again Beats Back Class Certification Motion in Consumer Fraud Case The American Lawyer Shortly after Pfizer predecessor Warner-Lambert agreed to pay more than $430 million to resolve criminal charges and civil liabilities for promoting off-label uses for its epilepsy drug Neurontin in 2004, plaintiffs lawyers sought to represent a nationwide class of consumers and third-party payers against the pharmaceutical giant, demanding more than $4 billion… [read post]
25 Jan 2009, 2:36 pm
McKinnell, while being groomed as CEO in 2001, was instrumental in Pfizer's $115 billion acquisition of Warner- Lambert Co., the developer of Lipitor. [read post]
19 Nov 2008, 9:04 am
Warner-Lambert & Co., 467 F.3d 85, 97 (2d Cir.2006)(same Michigan statute was not preempted by Buckman), affirmed sub nom, Warner-Lambert Co., LLC v. [read post]
17 Nov 2008, 6:48 pm
The gap that the Supreme Court's non-precedential decision, Warner-Lambert Co., LLC v. [read post]
11 Jul 2008, 4:30 am
: (Spicy IP), India: Ranbaxy-Daiichi deal – Opportunities for private equity companies in India: (Profitability through Simplicity), India: (KEI) Cracking open anti-competitive practices in the developing world: complaints, amendments and waivers: (Spicy IP), India: Is it one rule for Indian pharma companies and another one for those from abroad? [read post]
30 May 2008, 9:09 am
: (Spicy IP), India: DCGI preparing document to implement patent-registration linkage: (Spicy IP), New Zealand: Generic pharmaceutical companies taking advantage of NZ IP laws and medicines regulations: (International Law Office), Uganda: Cipla licenses ARV technology into Uganda: (Afro-IP), US: Money saved through generic prescriptions: (GenericsWeb), US: Government plans to keep close tab on drug patent settlements: (GenericsWeb), US: FTC reports 14 deals to delay generics in 2007:… [read post]
25 Mar 2008, 9:57 am by GenericIPguy
., Pfizer Ireland Pharmaceuticals, Warner-Lambert Company, Warner-Lambert Company LLC and Warner-Lambert Export [read post]
12 Feb 2008, 8:29 am
Kent case shows how reluctant courts can be to admit that §337(a) means what it says (in Farm Raised Salmon, the pending Warner-Lambert v. [read post]