Search for: "Warner-Lambert Company"
Results 41 - 60
of 217
Sorted by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
25 Mar 2008, 9:57 am
., Pfizer Ireland Pharmaceuticals, Warner-Lambert Company, Warner-Lambert Company LLC and Warner-Lambert Export [read post]
1 Feb 2011, 4:01 am
When the direct purchasers, who are really wholesale dealers several steps removed from patients, come in, though, it's a different story entirely, like in the Neurotin decision last week from the District Court for New Jersey: Plaintiffs in the instant action each directly purchased Neurontin, a brand-name version of the drug compound gabapentin anhydrous ('gabapentin'), from Defendants Pfizer, Inc. and Warner-Lambert Company, LLC (collectively,… [read post]
17 May 2013, 10:55 am
In December 1996, Parke-Davis Pharmaceutical Research, a division of Warner-Lambert Company, obtained FDA approval to market Lipitor. [read post]
22 Dec 2016, 9:10 am
Following Warner-Lambert CA II, Warner-Lambert sought to engage the NHS with a view to revising this guidance. [read post]
15 Aug 2006, 7:45 am
Parke-Davis, Division of Warner-Lambert Company (now owned by Pfizer, Inc). [read post]
13 Oct 2008, 9:59 pm
According to documents in the Boston case, a European study done in the late 1990s by Warner-Lambert to measure Neurontin's use for diabetic nerve pain produced consternation at Pfizer after it failed to find a significant effect. [read post]
9 Mar 2015, 12:23 pm
.* Warner-Lambert v Actavis Mark 4: harmony between parties in ‘lyrical’ patent disputeLast Thursday, Jeremy reported a High Court Order obtained by Warner-Lambert (part of the Pfizer group) mandating the NHS to release guidance about the prescribing of pregabalin (Warner-Lambert Company, LLC v Actavis Group PTC EHF & Others[2015] EWHC 485 (Pat) (02 March 2015)) [on which see the IPKat earlier posts, here and here]. [read post]
24 Oct 2016, 2:35 am
Had Warner-Lambert succeeded in upholding valid claims on which they relied for infringement, it would then have been necessary to decide whether, at any of the various dates analysed by the judge, that test of knowledge or foresight was satisfied. [read post]
9 Feb 2012, 9:42 pm
The court explained that in Warner-Lambert v. [read post]
3 Aug 2009, 1:04 am
Pfizer said the settlement involved actions before the company bought Warner-Lambert and Bulger's doctors didn't prescribe the drug because of off-label marketing. [read post]
26 Jan 2009, 6:54 am
Pfizer's take-over of Warner-Lambert was related to Lipitor.See alsoWhat happened to the guy who developed Lipitor? [read post]
29 Nov 2007, 7:45 am
Medtronic and Warner-Lambert v. [read post]
3 Aug 2018, 8:22 am
The Kluwer Patent Blog also looks forward to the imminently expected decision from the Supreme Court in the Warner-Lambert v Actavis case (the hearing for which was reported here for IPKat). [read post]
28 Feb 2015, 4:26 am
Australia’s competition watchdog has failed to convince a Federal Court judge that a strategy employed by pharmaceutical company Pfizer, to enter the market for generic products upon expiry of its patent covering blockbuster cholesterol-lowering drug LIPITOR, constituted an illegal misuse of market power, or ‘exclusive dealing’: Australian Competition and Consumer Commission v Pfizer Australia Pty Ltd [2015] FCA 113.From the year 2000, when it acquired Warner… [read post]
6 Nov 2015, 7:00 am
But he also held that the balance of convenience favoured Actavis.Emboldened by this, Actavis sought to strike out the action, which Arnold J declined to do (Warner-Lambert II), except in relation to the claim for contributory infringement under Section 60(2) of the Patents Act, which he did strike out (Warner-Lambert III). [read post]
6 Nov 2015, 6:58 am
The patent belongs Warner-Lambert, a company that was acquired by Pfizer in 2000. [read post]
15 Jun 2015, 7:13 am
Almost all of these updates have been compiled and crafted by our good friend and dedicated colleague Alberto Bellan, to whom the IPKat and Merpel raise their paws in a respectful and grateful salute.Don't forget: there's also a mini-summary at the bottom of the post that lists the features carried by this weblog over the previous month.Last week's substantive Katposts look like this:* Swiss claims: a Kat reflects on the Warner-Lambert v Actavis appealAfter… [read post]
14 Jul 2020, 11:04 am
In 1959, a federal court ruled that Listerine’s distributor— Warner-Lambert Pharmaceutical—must continue to abide by the original 1881 royalty agreement despite the fact that Listerine’s formula had previously been made public. [read post]
4 Mar 2008, 2:34 pm
Supreme Court issued its ruling in the Warner-Lambert v. [read post]
29 Aug 2011, 7:56 am
Prior to that, he spent 17 years with Warner-Lambert, which is now part of Pfizer, Inc. [read post]
