Search for: "Warner-Lambert Company"
Results 61 - 80
of 217
Sort by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
22 Dec 2016, 9:10 am
Following Warner-Lambert CA II, Warner-Lambert sought to engage the NHS with a view to revising this guidance. [read post]
16 Dec 2016, 4:44 am
.* AIPPI Rapid Response Report: Debating Lyrica's recurring pain on plausibility, abuse and infringementIn a guest post, Kat friend Steven Willis recaps 3 keynote experts’ latest revisits to Warner-Lambert’s patent issues, which covers the plausibility/insufficiency aspects of the Court of Appeal judgment, the amendment and related abuse of process issues and the thorny area of the construction and infringement of Swiss type claims. [read post]
8 Dec 2016, 3:20 am
Kalden, Brinkman and Van Nispen10) How many defendants were there to the Danish action brought by Warner-Lambert and Pfizer in relation to Krka’s generic pregabalin in 2015? [read post]
7 Dec 2016, 11:58 pm
Warner-Lambert did not object to the argument being raised at this stage. [read post]
18 Nov 2016, 12:44 am
John Collins, Sumer Dayal and Natalie ShoolmanClayton Utz by John Collins, Natalie Shoolman & Sumer Dayal On 21 October 2016, the Federal Court of Australia handed down its judgment in the case of Apotex Pty Ltd v Warner-Lambert Company LLC (No 2) [2016] FCA 1238 (FCA Judgment). [read post]
24 Oct 2016, 2:35 am
Had Warner-Lambert succeeded in upholding valid claims on which they relied for infringement, it would then have been necessary to decide whether, at any of the various dates analysed by the judge, that test of knowledge or foresight was satisfied. [read post]
17 Oct 2016, 12:11 pm
Author AcdxSource WikipediaCreative Commons Licence Generics (UK) Ltd (t/a Mylan) v Warner-Lambert Company LLC [2016] EWCA Civ 1006 (13 Oct 2016) This was an appeal against Mr Justice Arnold's judgment in Generics (UK) Ltd (t/a Mylan) v Warner-Lambert Company LLC [2015] EWHC 2548 (Pat) which I discussed in The Pregabalin Trial: Generics (UK) Ltd v Warner-Lambert Company [read post]
23 Jul 2016, 5:53 pm
The facts of the case may be summarised as follows: In March 2015, Warner-Lambert filed an application for provisional measures against several companies that had obtained authorizations to market generics of pregabalin. [read post]
5 Apr 2016, 6:32 am
Brian commented that perhaps Mr Justice Arnold (who has heard the Warner-Lambert and Lilly cases), is not looking at the claims from the right perspective. [read post]
11 Jan 2016, 4:22 am
In 2015, readers could see him put his mental martial arts to test in AP Racing v Alcon [2015] EWHC 1371, Warner-Lambert v Actavis on behalf of the Highland Health Board [2015] EWHC 72 and Global Flood Defence System v Van den Noort Innovations [2015] EWHC 153. [read post]
13 Dec 2015, 4:01 pm
.* LG Mannheim: there is no German balsamicoMark reports on an interesting (and quite astonishing) German decision addressing the possible infringement of the “Aceto Balsamico di Modena” geographical indication by a German company using “Balsamico” vinegar.* Are the DTSA's ex parte seizure powers the Anton Piller Order's evil American cousin? [read post]
9 Dec 2015, 7:12 am
Warner-Lambert [read post]
25 Nov 2015, 6:47 am
Actavis does not support expedition of the appeals, but Warner-Lambert does. [read post]
23 Nov 2015, 2:40 pm
* The best coffee brand that you never heard of: COFIX as the brand of the yearNeil tells of his brand of the year, an Israeli company that started with selling coffee and ended up with becoming a true, fulfilling brand experience involving many other goods. [read post]
9 Nov 2015, 3:41 pm
The Sandoz companies launched their own full-label generic pregabalin product, without giving Warner Lambert prior notice of their intention to do so, and sold over 100,000 packs to of their product to Lloyds. [read post]
9 Nov 2015, 7:39 am
Each company had marketing authorisations for various indications, and is conducting clinical trials for other indications. [read post]
6 Nov 2015, 7:00 am
But he also held that the balance of convenience favoured Actavis.Emboldened by this, Actavis sought to strike out the action, which Arnold J declined to do (Warner-Lambert II), except in relation to the claim for contributory infringement under Section 60(2) of the Patents Act, which he did strike out (Warner-Lambert III). [read post]
6 Nov 2015, 6:58 am
The patent belongs Warner-Lambert, a company that was acquired by Pfizer in 2000. [read post]
12 Oct 2015, 12:11 pm
| IP: When innovation is the answer to a spiritual funk Never Too Late 63 [week ending on Sunday 13 September] - Fair compensation in reprography and private copying: the ECS’ version | Substitute sellers | Teva UK Ltd & Another v Leo Pharma | Evidence-based IP policy | KitKat case | UK IPO’s priorities | UK IPO’s website vs… [read post]
5 Oct 2015, 5:13 am
That is the sum of global IP losses due to 3D printing predicted by IT research and advisory company Gartner for the near future”, some say. [read post]
