Search for: "Washington v. Trump" Results 41 - 60 of 2,760
Sort by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
18 Mar 2024, 6:00 am by Sherica Celine
Department of Labor (DOL) has published its Final Rule for determining employee or independent contractor status under the Fair Labor Standards Act (FLSA). 1 The final rude, which went into effect on March 11, 2024, rescinds the independent contractor rule issued during the Trump Administration and replaces it with a standard markedly similar to that adopted by the courts in the pre-Trump era. [read post]
17 Mar 2024, 6:36 pm by Howard Bashman
” At the “Lawfare” blog, Justin Hendrix and Ryan Goodman have a post titled “A Conspiracy Theory Goes to the Supreme Court: How Did Murthy v Missouri Get This Far? [read post]
16 Mar 2024, 1:03 pm by Thomas B. Griffith
  I’m convinced that Justice Barrett’s concurrence in the Colorado Ballot Access case, Trump v. [read post]
14 Mar 2024, 8:24 am
Wade have no clue about the power of women,” Biden said, in an apparent reference to Trump, his 2024 Republican rival. [read post]
12 Mar 2024, 12:10 am by Josh Richman
Ron Wyden and former Congressman Chris Cox in Gonzalez v. [read post]
10 Mar 2024, 9:01 pm by Austin Sarat
Nixon when they led their Courts to genuinely unanimous decisions.Looking at the decision in Trump v. [read post]
8 Mar 2024, 7:50 am by Ellena Erskine
Here’s the Friday morning read: Biden admonishes the Supreme Court for overturning Roe v. [read post]
7 Mar 2024, 9:05 pm by Sri Medicherla
The agency explained that the ruling in Dobbs v. [read post]
4 Mar 2024, 3:30 am by Christine Bartholomew
But the future utility of such investigations may depend on a cryptic aside made by Chief Justice Roberts in the Court’s 2020 decision in Trump v. [read post]
4 Mar 2024, 3:00 am by jonathanturley
It is now subject to the same test that Supreme Court Justice Potter Stewart once used to identify pornography in the case Jacobellis v. [read post]
3 Mar 2024, 12:24 pm by Josh Blackman
[Professor Shugerman's argument that the 1793 Hamilton Document, that is, a list of "every person holding any civil office or employment under the United States, (except the judges)," was intended to ensure compliance with the Constitution's Sinecure Clause lacks support.] [read post]