Search for: "Washington v. United States, et al"
Results 21 - 40
of 905
Sorted by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
30 Jun 2009, 9:11 pm
7-1-2009 Washington DC:The United States Supreme Court ruled in Safford Unified School District #1, et al. v. [read post]
28 Aug 2006, 1:57 pm
An exchange of notes that addresses many points of a future agreement between nations but is silent on certain aspects of the agreement cannot remove the unspoken matter from the realm of justiciable issues under the act of state and related doctrines, the United States Court of Appeals for the Third Circuit held in Eli Gross et al. v. [read post]
13 Dec 2023, 12:11 pm
(Defamation; Nuisance: Counterclaims) United States v. [read post]
22 Jul 2009, 4:33 pm
Northshore United Church, et al. the Supreme Court of Washington held that the City’s "total refusal" to process a land use application for a homeless encampment on Church property violated the Washington state constitution. [read post]
11 Apr 2023, 5:00 am
Jarvis Brown, et al. quadruple homicide prosecution. [read post]
21 May 2008, 8:42 am
Water’s Edge Associates, et al., Superior Court of the State of Washington for Clark County, Case No. 05-2-03446-1 (2008) is a good example of how, when allowed adequate discovery, an insurer was able to reveal to the court the true collusive nature of a covenant judgment between the insured and the injured party. [read post]
26 May 2021, 9:51 am
Facts: This case (Chung et al v. [read post]
25 May 2011, 11:53 am
However, as Judicial Watch noted, in United States v. [read post]
12 Dec 2011, 11:18 am
The Supreme Court today granted a writ of certiorari in Arizona et al. v. [read post]
13 Jan 2015, 9:00 am
The decision is reported as United States of America, et al. v. [read post]
25 Nov 2006, 4:11 pm
Republic of Peru et al., docket number 05-16235, on November 1, 2006. [read post]
19 Nov 2006, 1:11 pm
ENC Corporation et al., docket number 04-16401, the United States Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit resolved the indispensable party issue with respect to the Republic of the Philippines, Arelma, Roxas and Golden Buddha in favor of human rights victims, confirming the Hawaiian district court decision on September 12, 2006. -- Clemens Kochinke, Berliner, Corcoran & Rowe, LLP, Washington. [read post]
14 Dec 2011, 6:02 pm
Socialist People's Libyan Arab Jarmahiriya et al., docket number 05-1932. [read post]
21 May 2008, 8:42 am
Water’s Edge Associates, et al., Superior Court of the State of Washington for Clark County, Case No. 05-2-03446-1 (2008) is a good example of how, when allowed adequate discovery, an insurer was able to reveal to the court the true collusive nature of a covenant judgment between the insured and the injured party. [read post]
1 Apr 2012, 10:00 am
United States Senate Armed Forces Services Committee, et al., No. 11-1098 (previously discussed here). [read post]
9 Nov 2022, 10:22 am
Arkansas Times LP v Mark Waldrip, et al, No. 19-1378 (8th Circuit, 2022). [read post]
15 Jan 2007, 7:15 pm
Perles et al. v. [read post]
22 Mar 2010, 2:27 am
Jason Vitulano, et al., Case No. 09-80156-CR-MIDDLEBROOKS(s). [read post]
20 Mar 2015, 5:05 pm
This post examines an issue that arose in the case of Music Group Macao Commercial Offshore Limited, et al. v. [read post]
19 Jul 2023, 1:42 pm
Hittle, et al. [read post]
