Search for: "Wellogix, Inc." Results 1 - 14 of 14
Sorted by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
24 May 2011, 6:32 pm
Law360 is reporting that a federal jury in Texas on Friday awarded software company Wellogix Inc. $94.4 million in a contract and trade secrets suit that accused consulting firm Accenture LLP of reneging on a joint marketing deal.The jury found that Accenture had misappropriated and stolen Wellogix’s trade secrets from May 2006 onward, and said it must pay Wellogix $26.2 million in compensatory damages and $68.2 million in punitive damages.Wellogix, which… [read post]
27 Nov 2013, 4:22 am
("ADP") filed a declaratory judgment action against Wellogix, Inc., and Wellogix Technology Licensing LLC ("Wellogix") for a determination that ADP does not infringe a Wellogix method patent on comparing data from purchase orders, field data, and invoices. [read post]
30 May 2014, 7:11 pm by Maureen Johnston
Wellogix, Inc. 13-1051 Issue: Whether Federal Rule of Evidence 702 requires a court, and not the jury, to decide whether expert testimony is “based on sufficient facts or data” and “reliably applie[s] . . . principles and methods to the facts of the case,” and to set aside a jury verdict that rests on expert testimony that fails to meet these fundamental requirements. [read post]
3 Feb 2011, 8:24 am by Stefanie Levine
Patent No. 7,69,133 entitled SYSTEM AND METHOD FOR DEVELOPING RULES UTILIZING IN A KNOWLEDGE MANAGEMENT SYSTEM and owned by Wellogix Technology Licensing. [read post]
3 Feb 2011, 8:24 am by Stefanie Levine
Patent No. 7,69,133 entitled SYSTEM AND METHOD FOR DEVELOPING RULES UTILIZING IN A KNOWLEDGE MANAGEMENT SYSTEM and owned by Wellogix Technology Licensing. [read post]
20 May 2019, 9:11 am by MOTP
PLS Financial Services, Inc., however, a federal district court and the Fifth Circuit reached the opposite conclusion in a proposed class action presenting the very same litigation waiver question under almost identical factual circumstances, 689 Fed.Appx. 800 (5th Cir. 2017) (per curiam).How should these cases be counted? [read post]