Search for: "Whirlpool Corp."
Results 21 - 40
of 209
Sort by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
14 Aug 2017, 12:55 pm
Whirlpool Corp. [read post]
4 Aug 2017, 9:25 am
AWH Corp., 415 F.3d 1303, 1312 (Fed. [read post]
27 Apr 2017, 6:44 am
., 706 A.2d 814 (Pa. 1998)] and [Whirlpool Corp. v. [read post]
28 Mar 2017, 9:40 am
Whirlpool Corp., 556 F.3d 502 (6th Cir., 2009) (Title VII extended to Plaintiffs who were not members of the protected class but claimed they were discriminated against because they were friends with and spoke out on behalf of their African-American co-workers). [read post]
5 Aug 2016, 2:54 pm
Whirlpool Corp. has filed 40 lawsuits to protect one replacement part: a $50 refrigerator water filter. [read post]
5 Feb 2016, 8:25 am
Whirlpool Corp., 728 F.2d 1423 (Fed. [read post]
9 Nov 2015, 4:00 am
This has been described by the Supreme Court of Canada in Whirlpool Corp v. [read post]
8 Sep 2015, 3:26 pm
Whirlpool Corp., 728 F.2d 1423, 1439 (Fed. [read post]
16 Jul 2015, 4:00 am
Polylok Corp. (1983), 74 C.P.R. (2d) 34 (F.C.T.D.); Whirlpool Corp. v. [read post]
30 Jun 2015, 6:52 am
Whirlpool Corp, the trial court did, however, permit the plaintiff to conduct a supplemental deposition of the defense expert witness to question him about his calculations[15]. [read post]
12 May 2015, 2:43 pm
Inc. 06366QN86 Bank of Montreal Reverse Exchangeable Notes linked to Deere & Company 06366QN94 Bank of Montreal Reverse Exchangeable Notes linked to Moodys Corporation 06366QP27 Bank of Montreal Reverse Exchangeable Notes linked to CBS Corp. 06366QP35 Bank of Montreal Reverse Exchangeable Notes linked to Schlumberger, Ltd. 06366QP43 Bank of Montreal Reverse Exchangeable Notes linked to Amazon.com, Inc. 06366QP68 Bank of Montreal Reverse Exchangeable Notes linked to Whirlpool… [read post]
4 May 2015, 10:23 pm
Nor did Comcast Corp. v. [read post]
12 Feb 2015, 3:15 pm
Cannon Corp. [read post]
20 Jan 2015, 4:00 am
Whirlpool Corp., 113 Cal. [read post]
24 Dec 2014, 1:35 am
Pella Corp. [read post]
6 Dec 2014, 8:02 am
Whirlpool Corp., 716 F.2d 1010 (4th Cir.1983), in which this Court found that the district court properly held that the 180–day filing requirement of the Age Discrimination in Employment Act (“ADEA”) was tolled by reason of the plaintiff’s employer’s failure to post statutory notice of workers’ rights under the Act. [read post]
3 Dec 2014, 7:26 am
” In arguing that her claims should be equitably tolled, the employee relied on Vance v Whirlpool Corp., in which the Fourth Circuit found that the 180-day filing requirement of the ADEA was tolled by reason of an employer’s failure to post statutory notice of workers’ rights under the Act. [read post]
31 Oct 2014, 10:35 am
In re Whirlpool Corp. [read post]
16 Sep 2014, 1:01 pm
In re Whirlpool Corp. [read post]
11 Jun 2014, 6:31 am
BASF Corp. [read post]
